Norah Jones nh.jone...@gmail.com hat am 26. April 2013 um 05:56 geschrieben:
Hi,
I have downloaded HipHop for my website, I am going through various web links
which are suggesting that performance will improve 3-6 times. However I don't
know the Stability of the HipHop.
Please provide your
On Fri, Apr 26, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Norah Jones nh.jone...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I have downloaded HipHop for my website, I am going through various web
links which are suggesting that performance will improve 3-6 times. However
I don't know the Stability of the HipHop.
Please provide your
[snip]
Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
has *RUN*time configuration)
[/snip]
http://www.priadoblender.com ?
--
PHP
You could try this Jay (I havent used it before, has anybody?)
http://www.roadsend.com/home/index.php?SMC=1
Zac
-Original Message-
From: Jay Blanchard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 15 March 2005 11:21
To: Davy Durham; php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: RE: [PHP] php compiler
[snip
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
has *RUN*time configuration)
[/snip]
Jason Barnett wrote:
Jay Blanchard wrote:
[snip]
Sooo.. I'm assuming there's no stable project for compiling php code to
native binary machine code huh? (I've done some searching) Even
anything commercial? (I didn't care for Zend's optimizer so much.. still
has *RUN*time configuration)
[/snip]
Hello,
on 03/15/2005 03:05 AM Warren Vail said the following:
I could be wrong, but I believe that all the Java apps out there are not
native binary machine code either? unless you count the JRE (Java Runtime
Environment). Seems to me that is the way things are today, with JRE's all
having run
I could be wrong, but I believe that all the Java apps out there are not
native binary machine code either? unless you count the JRE (Java Runtime
Environment). Seems to me that is the way things are today, with JRE's all
having run time configuration. I would prefer to PHP to Java any day.
I kind of hinted in my earlier what is going on but:
$a = 1 $b = 0;
Is first silently evaluated as:
$a = (1 $b = 0);
thx your answer, just one more little thing...
So the right expression is tested which happens to be ($b = 0).
...why ($b = 0) is on the right side, not only $b.
Felho
Hi!
I think the precedence of left and right associative operands can't
be compared. The switch between associativities already separates the
expression (if it could be explained this way).
Yes, this behaviour confused me. This is not common in other programming
languages:
o C :
* Thus wrote Hodicska Gergely:
Hi!
I think the precedence of left and right associative operands can't
be compared. The switch between associativities already separates the
expression (if it could be explained this way).
Yes, this behaviour confused me. This is not common in other
You're assigning values in your test.
Use == instead of = in the if condition.
=M
-Original Message-
From: Hodicska Gergely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 30, 2004 9:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] php compiler
Hi!
$a = 0;
$b = 1;
if ($a = 1 $b = 0) {
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
$a = 0;
$b = 1;
if ($a = 1 $b = 0) {
echo 'true ';
var_dump($a);
var_dump($b);
} else {
echo 'false ';
var_dump($a);
var_dump($b);
}
Runing this we get: true bool(false) int(0)
Are you sure you posted the example correctly? It outputs this: false
Mike wrote:
You're assigning values in your test.
Use == instead of = in the if condition.
hmm, but he should not get what he gets anyways:
$a = 1 - evaluates to true, continue
$b = 0 - evaluates to false, so the whole if() condition is false, jump
to else and print:
false
1
0
He gets:
true
Marek Kilimajer wrote:
Mike wrote:
You're assigning values in your test.
Use == instead of = in the if condition.
hmm, but he should not get what he gets anyways:
$a = 1 - evaluates to true, continue
$b = 0 - evaluates to false, so the whole if() condition is false, jump
to else and print:
ok,
Use == instead of = in the if condition.
Thx, I know the difference. The exapmle use willfuly =.
Felho
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
It outputs this: false bool(false) int(0)
Yes, this the right output.
And this output is absolutely correct. Your condition gives new values
to $a and $b because you use = and not ==. So you do this:
Maybe you never read this:
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
It outputs this: false bool(false) int(0)
Yes, this the right output.
And this output is absolutely correct. Your condition gives new values
to $a and $b because you use = and not ==. So you do this:
Maybe you never read this:
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
$a = 1 $b = 0
PHP sees two expressions here:
After the precedence table the first thing should be evaluating 1 $b,
so we get:
$a = false = 0
Which is not meaningful thing, and maybe this cause that the evaluating
of the statment is not in the right order.
= has a right
If you see the output, it seems, that PHP evaluate first $b = 0, and
this is the problem.
$a = 1 $b = 0
PHP sees two expressions here:
After the precedence table the first thing should be evaluating 1 $b,
so we get:
$a = false = 0
Which is not meaningful thing, and maybe this cause that the
= has a right associativity. This is well explained on the page you
Oke, but has a higher precedence. The right associativity has
sense when all the operand has the same precedence.
Felho
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hodicska Gergely wrote:
Oke, but has a higher precedence. The right associativity has
sense when all the operand has the same precedence.
I think the precedence of left and right associative operands can't be
compared. The switch between associativities already separates the
expression (if it
* Thus wrote Hodicska Gergely:
If you see the output, it seems, that PHP evaluate first $b = 0, and
this is the problem.
$a = 1 $b = 0
PHP sees two expressions here:
After the precedence table the first thing should be evaluating 1 $b,
so we get:
$a = false = 0
Which is not
On Wed, 2004-10-27 at 19:26 -0500, Bill McCuistion wrote:
Sorry if this is an old question:
Where can I find information on any plans to create a compiler for PHP,
especially v5.x?
Barring that, is there a PHP syntax checker that would enforce some of the
types of things that a compiler
Try;
http://www.zend.com
Warren Vail
-Original Message-
From: Bill McCuistion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 27, 2004 5:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] PHP Compiler?
Sorry if this is an old question:
Where can I find information on any plans to
Zend Technologies has an encoder, might be what your looking for, might not.
why do you want to compile your code, you havent mentioned ?
--
Chris Lee
Mediawaveonline.com
em. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph. 250.377.1095
ph. 250.376.2690
fx. 250.554.1120
"dmalcolm" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
At 9:10 AM -0600 2/16/01, dmalcolm wrote:
Is there such a thing as a PHP compiler? Linux based? Windoze based?
Thanks in advance.
Depends on what you mean by a compiler. If you mean a "package"
that turns your PHP script into a 100% stand-alone binary executable
then No, there isn't. If you
Chris Lee wrote:
Zend Technologies has an encoder, might be what your looking for, might not.
why do you want to compile your code, you havent mentioned ?
--
Chris Lee
Mediawaveonline.com
em. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ph. 250.377.1095
ph. 250.376.2690
fx. 250.554.1120
"dmalcolm" [EMAIL
Jim Jagielski wrote:
At 9:10 AM -0600 2/16/01, dmalcolm wrote:
Is there such a thing as a PHP compiler? Linux based? Windoze based?
Thanks in advance.
Depends on what you mean by a compiler. If you mean a "package"
that turns your PHP script into a 100% stand-alone binary executable
29 matches
Mail list logo