On 20/08/07, tedd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 10:40 PM +0200 8/19/07, Wouter van Vliet / Interpotential wrote:
What you're proposing, is to actually display some content on another
page
then were the content is originally intended? I'm sorry, but I would
consider that 'bad practice'. To me,
At 12:42 PM +0200 8/20/07, Wouter van Vliet / Interpotential wrote:
Only thing I was trying to do was chip in my two cents. Again, I
wasn't the one who originally asked the question and I certainly am
not friggen clueless.
Maybe not, but you made some pretty clueless remarks -- like if you
At 8:52 AM +0200 8/19/07, Otto Wyss wrote:
In my case I could easilly do without redirection but just exit and
fall back on the calling page. Yet I want to remove the login page
from the browser history. Does the header function have the same
effect?
O. Wyss:
Instead of messing with the
What you're proposing, is to actually display some content on another page
then were the content is originally intended? I'm sorry, but I would
consider that 'bad practice'. To me, it makes perfect sense that you don't
want to leave the user on the page where login was originally handled. For
At 10:40 PM +0200 8/19/07, Wouter van Vliet / Interpotential wrote:
What you're proposing, is to actually display some content on another page
then were the content is originally intended? I'm sorry, but I would
consider that 'bad practice'. To me, it makes perfect sense that you don't
want to
5 matches
Mail list logo