I have investigated some frameworks.. Zend and Codeiginiter but I
haven't done any testing/exercises. They seem to make things much more
simple/faster yes...but I'm not sure how much time it will take to get
know one of them(or CakePHP). And I haven't got into reading
licences...I'm sure they h
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 06:28 +0200, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> From my experience with Codeigniter, thats one of the best php frameworks I
> have ever seen.
> It functionality is awesome, you can integrate your own modifications to the
> IC core without any problems at all, for more confortable you ev
On Thu, 2008-07-31 at 06:41 +0200, Nitsan Bin-Nun wrote:
> Umm I suggest you try this code:
>
> index.php:
>
> $formContainer = <<
Those ampersands should be appropriately marked up.
:B
Cheers,
Rob.
--
http://www.interjinn.com
Application and Templating Framework for PHP
--
PHP Ge
Umm I suggest you try this code:
index.php:
EOF;
if (!isset($_POST['submitted']))
echo $formContainer;
else
{
echo "";
var_dump($_GET);
echo "\n\n\n";
var_dump($_POST);
echo '';
echo $formContainer;
}
?>
HTH,
Nitsan
2008/7/31 Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTEC
>From my experience with Codeigniter, thats one of the best php frameworks I
have ever seen.
It functionality is awesome, you can integrate your own modifications to the
IC core without any problems at all, for more confortable you even don't
have to use a template system (but I'm pretty sure that
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 9:50 PM, Konrad Priemer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kann mir mal wer auf die Sprünge helfen, ich bekomme es gerade nicht
> geregelt ein Image "on-the-fly" von einem Remote-Host per fsockopen auf
> meinen Server zu ziehen.
>
> Irgendwo hab ich da voll die Blockade ;)
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 22:18 -0400, Edward Diener wrote:
> In handling an HTTP POST request I came across some PHP code, which I
> need to modify for my own purposes, which has code like this:
>
> if ( ! (isset($_GET['x']) && $_GET['x'] == 20) )
> {
> // Do something by returning
This page can help you understand them better:
http://us2.php.net/manual/en/language.variables.superglobals.php
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com
Edward Diener wrote:
> In handling an HTTP POST request I came across some PHP code, which I
> need
In handling an HTTP POST request I came across some PHP code, which I
need to modify for my own purposes, which has code like this:
if ( ! (isset($_GET['x']) && $_GET['x'] == 20) )
{
// Do something by returning an error
}
Can this ever be correct when the form looks like:
Dont leave your nights dissatisfied
http://uimeds.com/
Moin,
kann mir mal wer auf die Sprünge helfen, ich bekomme es gerade nicht
geregelt ein Image "on-the-fly" von einem Remote-Host per fsockopen auf
meinen Server zu ziehen.
Irgendwo hab ich da voll die Blockade ;)
Mein "nichtfunktionierender" Versuch:
...
...
$out = "GET ".." HTTP/1.0
John Meyer wrote:
Apache 2.2
PHP 5.2.6 (as a module)
Windows
Relevant parts of php.ini
; Directory in which the loadable extensions (modules) reside.
extension_dir = I:\php\ext
extension=I:\php\ext\php_mssql.dll
extension=I:\php\ext\php_mysql.dll
Note: I did try it with just the name ("php_mys
Per Jessen wrote:
> Lester Caine wrote:
>
>> Some ISP's are still only supporting rather ancient versions of PHP4.
>> They should simply be warned of the security risks. Some ISP's have a
>> PHP5 offering, but again an older version simply because it causes
>> less problems when converting from PH
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 6:51 PM, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have traditionally used double quotes going back to my PASCAL days.
>
> I see many PHP examples using single quotes, and I began to adopt that
> convention.
>
> Even updating existing code.
>
> And I broke some stuff that was d
On 7/30/08, Stephen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But I wonder, is there any reason to use single quotes?
extremely minor performance gains, afaik.
probably moreso when doing $foo["bar"] and $foo['bar']
but i believe it's negligible $foo = 'bar' and $foo = "bar"
sara golemon did some performanc
I have traditionally used double quotes going back to my PASCAL days.
I see many PHP examples using single quotes, and I began to adopt that
convention.
Even updating existing code.
And I broke some stuff that was doing variable expansion. So I am back
to using double quotes.
But I wonder,
Apache 2.2
PHP 5.2.6 (as a module)
Windows
Relevant parts of php.ini
; Directory in which the loadable extensions (modules) reside.
extension_dir = I:\php\ext
extension=I:\php\ext\php_mssql.dll
extension=I:\php\ext\php_mysql.dll
Note: I did try it with just the name ("php_mysql.dll") but it doe
This one time, at band camp, "Paul Jinks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone know of any good resources on building a tagging system? The
> video for now will be held on a normal LAMP machine as will everything
> else.
Tagging...
http://phpro.org/tutorials/Tagging-With-PHP-And-MySQL.html
K
This one time, at band camp, "Richard Heyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm interested - why are people still using PHP4? It's been over 4
> years (I think) - plenty of time to upgrade to five.
I asked that question and was called a troll...
Kevin
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:53 PM, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> We are running like:
> php mailscript.php
>
> The version:
>
> php-v
>
> PHP 5.2.5 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Dec 12 2007 03:51:56)
Did you check what Jim suggested, as well, about short_open_tags?
Daniel Brown wrote:
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:19 PM, JJB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We recently rebuilt a webserver and upgraded it to opensuse 10.3.
Now, when our webdev people run command line php scripts all of the
included files are being output to the terminal instead of parsed.
You might want to check the scope of the properties. If you want to
access them outside of the class, make sure they are declared public.
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com
Marten Lehmann wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm using some php-classes which work
Marten Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
I'm using some php-classes which worked fine with php-5.0.4. Now I tried
to upgrade to php-5.2.6, but the classes give a lot of errors. If I set
error_reporting(E_ALL);
I see messages like
Notice: Undefined property: FastTemplate::$main in
/whereever/inc.templa
Hello,
I'm using some php-classes which worked fine with php-5.0.4. Now I tried
to upgrade to php-5.2.6, but the classes give a lot of errors. If I set
error_reporting(E_ALL);
I see messages like
Notice: Undefined property: FastTemplate::$main in
/whereever/inc.template.php on line 293
No
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I cannot get Php to run on Solaris 10...
Here is the error I am getting
Trying to run php outside of apache
ld.so.1: php: fatal: libldap-2.3.so.0: open failed: No such file or
directory
With Apache
I cannot get Php to run on Solaris 10...
Here is the error I am getting
Trying to run php outside of apache
ld.so.1: php: fatal: libldap-2.3.so.0: open failed: No such file or
directory
With ApacheApache will not load when tr
Hélio Rocha wrote:
U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a framework
but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than cake and there are some IDE's
that do support and debug it.
Cumps,
Hélio Rocha
There's also .NET http://www.microsoft.com. It's also a framework but
f
Dear Srs,
We are having some "zend_mm_heap corrupted" errors followed by a
"Segmentation fault (11)" in our Apache2 + PHP 5.2.6 servers. There are few
information about this "bug" in internet:
* #40479 -> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=40479
* #43295 -> http://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=43295
I
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:19 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I suppose to be complete, I should point out that in Linux a call to
> date finishes in 1.2271404266357E-5 seconds on average.
>
> For those unfamiliar with scientific notation, that would be:
> 0.12271404266357 second
Jason Pruim wrote:
>
> On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Micah Gersten wrote:
>
>> Sometimes speed improvements require removing things. If you end up
>> backwards supporting everything you end up with a big monster engine
>> that is incredibly slow.
>
>
> Just ask Microsoft about that ;)
Better
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 12:11 PM, Richard Lynch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I was profiling some code on my local dev box, and in Windows, the
> biggest time sink for the home page is...
>
> a call to date("Y/m/d H:i:s")?!
> 917 ms???
>
> Here is what I get in a cygwin shell:
> php -r '$c = 100; $
I suppose to be complete, I should point out that in Linux a call to
date finishes in 1.2271404266357E-5 seconds on average.
For those unfamiliar with scientific notation, that would be:
0.12271404266357 seconds, or rougly 1/10,000th of the time Doze
takes.
--
Some people ask for gifts here.
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:50 AM, Micah Gersten wrote:
Sometimes speed improvements require removing things. If you end up
backwards supporting everything you end up with a big monster engine
that is incredibly slow.
Just ask Microsoft about that ;)
--
Jason Pruim
Raoset Inc.
Technology Mana
I was profiling some code on my local dev box, and in Windows, the
biggest time sink for the home page is...
a call to date("Y/m/d H:i:s")?!
917 ms???
Here is what I get in a cygwin shell:
php -r '$c = 100; $s = microtime(true); for($i = 0; $i < $c; $i++){ $d
= date("Y/m/d H:i:s"); } echo (microt
Sorry Robert and all other users.
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Robert Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:03 +0100, Hélio Rocha wrote:
> > U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a
> framework
> > but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than
On Wed, 2008-07-30 at 17:03 +0100, Hélio Rocha wrote:
> U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a framework
> but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than cake and there are some IDE's
> that do support and debug it.
Dear Hélio,
This is a PHP list. People usually come h
U may want to see Ruby On Rails www.rubyonrails.org . It's also a framework
but for Ruby. In my opinion it's stronger than cake and there are some IDE's
that do support and debug it.
Cumps,
Hélio Rocha
On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:54 PM, Shawn McKenzie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Micah Gersten wrot
Micah Gersten wrote:
Depending on the size of the site, you might want to consider a PHP
framework to start with. There's usually no point in reinventing the
wheel. Someone mentioned CakePHP which utilizes MVC. I'm looking into
porting my stuff to the Zend Framework which makes MVC optional, b
Per Jessen wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
I agree but not everyone think in the sameway. I have seen several
big websites that got hit because they haven't used super globals in
the code and their hosting provided would just change the PHP.ini
setting and nothing would work.
Well if it's a "big"
Because,
People believes
Do not fix until broke
Motto.
Testing new online application may painfull.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Depending on the size of the site, you might want to consider a PHP
framework to start with. There's usually no point in reinventing the
wheel. Someone mentioned CakePHP which utilizes MVC. I'm looking into
porting my stuff to the Zend Framework which makes MVC optional, but has
a lot of functio
Sometimes speed improvements require removing things. If you end up
backwards supporting everything you end up with a big monster engine
that is incredibly slow.
Thank you,
Micah Gersten
onShore Networks
Internal Developer
http://www.onshore.com
Hélio Rocha wrote:
> Brainfuck rox! LOL :)
>
> S
Sometimes deprecation is necessary is a language feature is created out
of necessity but is superseded by a superior language form.
A great example is the HTML FONT tag. Font tags slow down downloads and
renderings, and were deprecated in favor of CSS style sheets which offer
much more control and
Per Jessen wrote:
Lester Caine wrote:
Some ISP's are still only supporting rather ancient versions of PHP4.
They should simply be warned of the security risks. Some ISP's have a
PHP5 offering, but again an older version simply because it causes
less problems when converting from PHP4.
The pr
Hi,
Even if it's just a site don't thing u don't need a structure to it. Why not
a MVC structure? U can dig about cakephp on google to see some of it
working. If U don't want to use a framework, start with the business rules
u'll need, after that do the CRUD and for the piece of resistance assembl
2008/7/30 Raido <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Hi,
>
> There are many sites explaining how to build new site etc but I'd like to
> hear what You suggest. (about how to plan whole thing and how to write
> separate parts which can be put together later)
This may be of some help:
http://www.phpguru.org/stat
On Jul 30, 2008, at 10:34 AM, Raido wrote:
[snip lots of info]
I'm not sure but I have idea about what things I should do first:
1) think and write down any function that needs to be done(for
example different validations, functions for showing/posting form etc)
2) plan and create database?
Lester Caine wrote:
> Some ISP's are still only supporting rather ancient versions of PHP4.
> They should simply be warned of the security risks. Some ISP's have a
> PHP5 offering, but again an older version simply because it causes
> less problems when converting from PHP4.
The problem for an I
Richard Heyes wrote:
>> Umm, I beg to differ. A developer should not need to worry about a
>> possible/future upgrade of the runtime platform. I certainly don't
>> worry about the next release of gcc or glibc when I write C.
>
> Minor point releases certainly, but not major ones. They're major
Per Jessen wrote:
Richard Heyes wrote:
When U write code, U must not be worried 'bout the next upgrade of
your server!
Of course you should. Writing code with every eventuality in mind is
simply ludicrous.
Umm, I beg to differ. A developer should not need to worry about a
possible/future u
> Umm, I beg to differ. A developer should not need to worry about a
> possible/future upgrade of the runtime platform. I certainly don't
> worry about the next release of gcc or glibc when I write C.
Minor point releases certainly, but not major ones. They're major
upgrades for a reason - thing
Hi,
There are many sites explaining how to build new site etc but I'd like
to hear what You suggest. (about how to plan whole thing and how to
write separate parts which can be put together later)
I have build many small sites for myself(site to organise class assembly
which is like yearly c
Richard Heyes wrote:
>
>> When U write code, U must not be worried 'bout the next upgrade of
>> your server!
>
> Of course you should. Writing code with every eventuality in mind is
> simply ludicrous.
Umm, I beg to differ. A developer should not need to worry about a
possible/future upgrade
Hélio Rocha wrote:
> methods and worst, some hosters didn't know how to virtualize a
> f1ck1n' server with Apache+PHP5.
Despite their many inabilities, I doubt if any hosting service would
have a problem with that.
If you're trying to figure out why so many haven't changed, there's one
question
Brainfuck rox! LOL :)
Sure you must see the changelog and other things but take a look:
I can do more and better things with the next generation of the language in
which i wrote my app, but i don't think that it's fair that my app doens't
compile (if it was a compiled language) or stops executing
> Sorry to disagree,
That's nothing to apologise for.
> But I think that with PHP4 a lot of people start thinking that they could be
> programmers (maybe they can, developers it's another story). When php5 came
> they didn't know how do deal with the deprecated methods and worst, some
> hosters d
Quoting Hélio Rocha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Sorry to disagree,
But I think that with PHP4 a lot of people start thinking that they could be
programmers (maybe they can, developers it's another story). When php5 came
they didn't know how do deal with the deprecated methods and worst, some
hosters d
Sorry to disagree,
But I think that with PHP4 a lot of people start thinking that they could be
programmers (maybe they can, developers it's another story). When php5 came
they didn't know how do deal with the deprecated methods and worst, some
hosters didn't know how to virtualize a f1ck1n' serve
> The technical abilities and awareness is often inversely proportional to
> the size of the hoster.
Lol.
--
Richard Heyes
http://www.phpguru.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Richard Heyes wrote:
>> I agree but not everyone think in the sameway. I have seen several
>> big websites that got hit because they haven't used super globals in
>> the code and their hosting provided would just change the PHP.ini
>> setting and nothing would work.
>
> Well if it's a "big" websi
> I agree but not everyone think in the sameway. I have seen several big
> websites that got hit because they haven't used super globals in the code
> and their hosting provided would just change the PHP.ini setting and nothing
> would work.
Well if it's a "big" website then why use a hoster that
61 matches
Mail list logo
