On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:33:54 +0200, Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com
> We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
> (prefork MPM).
I also have PHP 5 and Apache 2 running on some servers, as I need some
Apache Modules that are only available for Apache 2 ... Also, I r
We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
(prefork MPM).
worker MPM could be a problem though...
regrds,
Bostjan
On Thursday 23 of September 2004 10:28, Frédéric Hardy wrote:
> Hello -
>
> I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
>
Hello -
I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
some php library are not compatible with multi-threading.
But php 5 ?
Best regards,
Fred -
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Hello,
And following the last line - I'm still running Apache2 with PHP5 on
Windows on an increasing number of sites, without a single problem to
date ;)
I switched to Apache 2 and PHP 5.0.0 a week ago and hand no problems so
far (several hundred thousand hits each day). Apache 2 is running in
Would it be just fine if I activated Apache2's 'prefork' module? I know
preforking defeats Apache2 purpose, but I am still wondering if it should
still work fine. :)
"Lester Caine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
>
> > Wow! And come to think
Why is there such a reluctance to using Apache 2? For stability issues,
PHP should recommend Apache 2 but in prefork mode. Instead of saying
Apache 2 is unsupported, just say non prefork mode is not supported.
Additionally, if PHP is more acceptable of Apache 2 (in the supported
mode), then use
Curt Zirzow wrote:
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many problems.
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=108736540021355&w=2
It was this or another message b
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
When I started playing with this, I had a windows machine onto which I
tried installing Apache1. After a couple of days of frustratio
* Thus wrote Oliver John V. Tibi:
> Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
> Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
I would stay with stick with apache 1.x.
The only reason I would consider apache2 is if there was a module
only available
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
"Live free() or die()."
"Lester Caine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED
> On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
>
>> Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
>
> You can, if it works for you, but ...
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107916708217647&w=2
>
> --
> Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz
Apache2 had
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
> Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
You can, if it works for you, but ...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-general&m=107916708217647&w=2
--
Jason Wong -> Gremlins Associates -> www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Syste
Hi,
I just wanted to post almost the same question: PHP for Apache 2 is
idling around for years now. configure --with-apxs2 is still marked as
[EXPERIMENTAL] and the documentation still warns:
"Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on
Unix nor on Windows."
What is t
Chris Hayes wrote:
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-dev&m=108736540021355&w=2
Very well explained. Untill now this problem was explained to me with a
lot of techno mumbo jumbo, and I could not make sense of it. But now I
think I really understand what's going o
At 18:55 19-7-04, you wrote:
> >I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
> >Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
> >
> >
> Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
> PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just
* Thus wrote raditha dissanayake:
> Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
>
> >Hi!
> >
> >I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
> >Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
> >
> >
> Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
> PH
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Thanks and Cheers!
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
"Live free() or die()."
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To un
Hello there,
Does someone know if Apache 2 support in PHP is stable when using Apache
2 as prcoess spawning only, I mean, no threads.
Somebody has seen performance improvements in Apache 2 when compared to
Apache 1.3??
I know it is experimental because of the threads configuration in the
new Apa
A few months back the official PHP website still warned againts PHP and
Apache 2. I am wondering about the current status of these two technologies
when used together. I am about to configure a web server and was going to
use Apache 1.3 with PHP4+ as opposed to Apache 2 with PHP4+. What are your
op
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002 12:06 PM
Subject: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3.
> Hi!
>
> When I am laoding php as module:
> LoadModule php4_module c:/php/sapi/php4apache2.dll
>
> I get the following error:
> Apache.exe: module "c:\php4build\snap\sapi\apache2filter\sap
Hi!
When I am laoding php as module:
LoadModule php4_module c:/php/sapi/php4apache2.dll
I get the following error:
Apache.exe: module "c:\php4build\snap\sapi\apache2filter\sapi_apache2.c" is not
compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020628, need 20020903).
Please contact the vendor for
t; > Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
> >
> >
> > Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for
> > production environments. Are there any further updates?
> >
t; Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
> > Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
> >
> >
> > Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for
> > production environments. Are there any further updates?
> >
> > What i
this?
Best regards,
Davy Obdam
mailto:info@;davyobdam.com
> -Oorspronkelijk bericht-
> Van: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:kjohnson@;zootweb.com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
> Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
>
>
> Last I hear
I heard mentioning a few more month for them to get working stably.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Johnson, Kirk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote... :
> Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
> environments. Are there any further updates?
>
> What is the best way t
Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
environments. Are there any further updates?
What is the best way to keep up on the status of this? Any good sites in
particular?
TIA
Kirk
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.n
At http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-4.php#4.2.0 there is a note (Note: Apache2
support is EXPERIMENTAL.)
Is this note still justified for PHP/4.2.2? Is it about security?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
28 matches
Mail list logo