Sent from my Galaxy S®III
Original message
From: Ashley Sheridan
Date: 03/15/2013 5:03 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Sebastian Krebs
Cc: gei...@b1-systems.de,georg ,PHP General List
Subject: Re: [PHP] PHP context editor
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 12:05 +0100, Sebastian Krebs
/3/15 Karim Geiger
>>>
>>> > Hi Georg,
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 23:10 +0100, georg wrote:
>>> > > hello,
>>> > > annyone knows of some good PHP context editor freeware ?
>>> > > (tired of missing out on
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 4:03 PM, Ashley Sheridan
wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 12:05 +0100, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
>
>> 2013/3/15 Karim Geiger
>>
>> > Hi Georg,
>> >
>> > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 23:10 +0100, georg wrote:
>> > > hello,
>
On Fri, 2013-03-15 at 12:05 +0100, Sebastian Krebs wrote:
> 2013/3/15 Karim Geiger
>
> > Hi Georg,
> >
> > On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 23:10 +0100, georg wrote:
> > > hello,
> > > annyone knows of some good PHP context editor freeware ?
> > > (tired
2013/3/15 Karim Geiger
> Hi Georg,
>
> On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 23:10 +0100, georg wrote:
> > hello,
> > annyone knows of some good PHP context editor freeware ?
> > (tired of missing out on trivials like ; )
>
> I don't know exactly what you mean by a cont
Hi Georg,
On Thu, 2013-03-14 at 23:10 +0100, georg wrote:
> hello,
> annyone knows of some good PHP context editor freeware ?
> (tired of missing out on trivials like ; )
I don't know exactly what you mean by a context editor but if you want
an editor with syntax highlighting try
hello,
annyone knows of some good PHP context editor freeware ?
(tired of missing out on trivials like ; )
regards
Georg
ah i forgot e_all doesnt include e_strict. with error_reporting(-1 /
E_ALL | E_STRICT) i see the errors. so i think i am right that the use
of that special behavior of php is not a good idea. thank you guys!
Am 23.05.2011 00:32, schrieb Richard Quadling:
On 22 May 2011 22:44, Simon Hilz wrote
On 22 May 2011 22:44, Simon Hilz wrote:
> i cant reproduce that error. which php version do you use?
> i've coded an example for a "behavior"-pattern:
>
Try with ...
call
TankUpBehavior::tankUp (100)
Strict Standards: Non-static method TankUpBehavior::tankUp() should
not be called statically, as
i cant reproduce that error. which php version do you use?
i've coded an example for a "behavior"-pattern:
=
error_reporting(E_ALL & E_STRICT);
class Car {
private $fuel = 0;
private $drivenDistance = 0;
private $consumption =
class A {
public function b() {
echo get_class($this);
}
static function c() {
echo get_class($this);
}
}
class B {
public function test(){
A::b();
A::c();
}
}
$b = new B;
$b->test();
Generates:
Strict Standards: Non-static method A::b() sho
ourse I can call a method from it.
Sorry
Richard L. Buskirk
-Original Message-
From: Simon Hilz [mailto:simon.h...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 11:56 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] context when calling non static method of class in a
static way
Richard,
yes!
]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 11:56 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] context when calling non static method of class in a
static way
Richard,
yes! at least my example works. i didn't test it any further; i doubt it
is intended that way.
Simon Hilz
Am 22.05.2011 16:42, schri
. Buskirk
-Original Message-
From: Simon Hilz [mailto:simon.h...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 11:56 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] context when calling non static method of class in a
static way
Richard,
yes! at least my example works. i didn't test it any fu
Mike,
yes i know the difference. I actually discovered that by accident when
i've forgot to write the static keyword. my code lead to an exception. i
wondered about the details of that exception and came to the solution
that the behavior as decribed exists. in my opinion one could really use
ssage-
From: Simon Hilz [mailto:simon.h...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:18 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] context when calling non static method of class in a static
way
hi,
lets assume the following classes:
class Foo{
public function bar()
{
Simon,
So without extending foo you can run bar in another class?
Richard L. Buskirk
-Original Message-
From: Simon Hilz [mailto:simon.h...@gmx.de]
Sent: Sunday, May 22, 2011 10:18 AM
To: php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: [PHP] context when calling non static method of class
Simon,
You may want to be careful with the way you declare your class methods.
Example:
public function bar() != static function bar(), even if you use
pnysudsfksdljfasdjfsd (::)
See the example below.
class Foo{
static function barStatic()
{
echo get_class($this);
}
hi,
lets assume the following classes:
class Foo{
public function bar()
{
echo get_class($this);
}
}
class Foobar{
public function callBarStatic()
{
Foo::bar();
}
}
the following code results in the output "Foobar":
$obj = new Foobar();
$obj
AFAIK, PHP "skips" over anything out side the ... so yes,
technically, it would be a little faster.
End of the day, such a small gain could probably be made up elsewhere by
optimising a function you use on every page, or something else like that.
It's been said on the list many times before: Just
> I was reading this article : http://www.devarticles.com/art/1/397/2
> And am a bit confused now.
>
> If I understand correctly, the author claims that :
>
>
> Combining HTML output and
>
> tags really wastes my time.
>
> Runs "slightly" faster than
>
>$php_tags = "PHP Tags";
> echo "N
HI
I was reading this article : http://www.devarticles.com/art/1/397/2
And am a bit confused now.
If I understand correctly, the author claims that :
Combining HTML output and
tags really wastes my time.
Runs "slightly" faster than
IS this true?
Is echo more consuming than entering
22 matches
Mail list logo
