[PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
Julian, could you please show us an example of this problem? -- João Cândido de Souza Neto SIENS SOLUÇÕES EM GESTÃO DE NEGÓCIOS Fone: (0XX41) 3033-3636 - JS www.siens.com.br Julian Muscat Doublesin opensourc...@gmail.com escreveu na mensagem news:5e0039ed0905280431o2e9d8036u217b0449eccd...@mail.gmail.com... Hi Everyone, This is the first time that I am posting in the PHP forum, so hope that I am osting in the right place. I would like to say that before submitting to this forum I have done some research looking for a solution without success. I had been programming in ASP.NET for years using Object Oriented Princeliness but decided to walk away from that. I am now researching and specialising in the open source world. I have started to develop a project using MySQL, PHP and OOP. So far I have succeed. However I got stuck once I started implement AJAX using the AJAX tutorial from w3schools.com. What I have discovered is: for some reason when you call a file that requires other fies using the REQUIRE or INCLUDE it just does not work. I can conform this as I have tested with out the the functions. Has anyone ever meet such a situation can you give me some feedback please. Thank you very much in advance for your support. Regards Julian -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
i never faced such a problem and i can assure you that it will never
happen. try...
main.php
?php
require('second.php');
?
second.php
test
call main.php via AJAX and see the responseText.
many things can go wrong in your coding. dont come to the conclusion
that this particular thing is not working.
i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
can see all the details of the communication between client and
server)
and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case)
library instead of highly limited plain javascript language
and for you case its difficult to comment without seeing your actual code.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
On May 28, 2009 8:49am, kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com wrote:
i never faced such a problem and i can assure you that it will never
happen. try...
main.php
require('second.php');
?
second.php
test
call main.php via AJAX and see the responseText.
many things can go wrong in your coding. dont come to the conclusion
that this particular thing is not working.
i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you
can see all the details of the communication between client and
server)
and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case)
library instead of highly limited plain javascript language
and for you case its difficult to comment without seeing your actual code.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you can see all the details of the communication between client and server) and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case) library instead of highly limited plain javascript language I also recommend using FirePHP with FireBug here's a nicely written tutorial on how to use them both together for Ajax'ed pages. http://tr.im/iyvl Thanks Lenin www.twitter.com/nine_L
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
Hi! Do not use low-level AJAX. There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY). Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your work. 2009/5/28 Lenin le...@phpxperts.net 2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you can see all the details of the communication between client and server) and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case) library instead of highly limited plain javascript language I also recommend using FirePHP with FireBug here's a nicely written tutorial on how to use them both together for Ajax'ed pages. http://tr.im/iyvl Thanks Lenin www.twitter.com/nine_L
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
2009/5/28 Olexandr Heneralov ohenera...@gmail.com Hi! Do not use low-level AJAX. There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY). Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your work. 2009/5/28 Lenin le...@phpxperts.net 2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you can see all the details of the communication between client and server) and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case) library instead of highly limited plain javascript language I also recommend using FirePHP with FireBug here's a nicely written tutorial on how to use them both together for Ajax'ed pages. http://tr.im/iyvl Thanks Lenin www.twitter.com/nine_L Moo, I would say learn to do PHP by itself before you go using frameworks. AJAX is a bit different though because there will be few reasons that you will ever need to write low level code when you're using a library like Prototype =) -- Luke Slater :O)
Re: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com... Two things: 1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead of foo/bar.php) 2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must! I totally disagree. I have been doing OOP with PHP for years, and I have never used autoloading. It is just a feature that can be used, misused or abused just like any other. I choose not to use it, and my code does not suffer in the least! -- Tony Marston http://www.tonymarston.net http://www.radicore.org -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:68de37340905280737t3e1ad844y188ab8fa08f17...@mail.gmail.com...
Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
require statements = :(
If you are too lazy to write require statements then you are probably too
lazy to write readable, well structured and efficient code. Besides, I don't
use require statements, I use
$dbobject = singleton::getInstance('classname');
I don't use autoload because *I* want to be in control. I prefer not to rely
on automatuic features which may not work as expected.
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Tony Marston
t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk
wrote:
oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead
of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
I totally disagree. I have been doing OOP with PHP for years, and I have
never used autoloading. It is just a feature that can be used, misused or
abused just like any other. I choose not to use it, and my code does not
suffer in the least!
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself time
so that I can spend more time writing that structured and efficient code of
which you speak. And the problem with what you're saying is that you still
have to include 'singleton.php' somewhere in order to call its static
methods, and I'd rather just spend 30 minutes writing an autoloader object
and letting it deal with finding any of the classes I use then trying to
keep track of legacy code I didn't write and require'ing them all over the
place.
The way I look at it, if you spend all your time handling things that you
could automate - and if written properly, will always work as expected (it's
called unit testing and debugging) - then you have no time to write that
structured and efficient code in order to meet your deadlines! :)
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Tony Marston
t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk wrote:
Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:68de37340905280737t3e1ad844y188ab8fa08f17...@mail.gmail.com...
Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
require statements = :(
If you are too lazy to write require statements then you are probably too
lazy to write readable, well structured and efficient code. Besides, I
don't
use require statements, I use
$dbobject = singleton::getInstance('classname');
I don't use autoload because *I* want to be in control. I prefer not to
rely
on automatuic features which may not work as expected.
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Tony Marston
t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk
wrote:
oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php instead
of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually
include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
I totally disagree. I have been doing OOP with PHP for years, and I have
never used autoloading. It is just a feature that can be used, misused
or
abused just like any other. I choose not to use it, and my code does not
suffer in the least!
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:68de37340905280801m6964d355l2d6d8ef773f3b...@mail.gmail.com...
There's a huge difference between laziness and opting in to use an
incredibly useful (and easy to properly deploy) feature to save myself
time
so that I can spend more time writing that structured and efficient code
of
which you speak. And the problem with what you're saying is that you
still
have to include 'singleton.php' somewhere in order to call its static
methods,
I have a single general purpose include file which autmatically includes all
other standard files, so I never have to explicity load my singleton class.
and I'd rather just spend 30 minutes writing an autoloader object
and letting it deal with finding any of the classes I use then trying to
keep track of legacy code I didn't write and require'ing them all over the
place.
I'd rather not waste 30 minutes of my time writing a feature that I don't
need.
The difference between using and not using the autoload feature does not
have any measurable impact on either my development times, nor the execution
of my code, so I choose to not use it. That's my choice, and I'm sticking to
it.
The way I look at it, if you spend all your time handling things that you
could automate - and if written properly, will always work as expected
(it's
called unit testing and debugging) - then you have no time to write that
structured and efficient code in order to meet your deadlines! :)
Not using autoload does not have any noticeable effect on my deadlines, so I
have no incentive to use it. Just because you say that I *should* use it
carries no weight at all.
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 10:53 AM, Tony Marston
t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk wrote:
Eddie Drapkin oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:68de37340905280737t3e1ad844y188ab8fa08f17...@mail.gmail.com...
Your code might not, but you sure do! Spending all that time writing
require statements = :(
If you are too lazy to write require statements then you are probably
too
lazy to write readable, well structured and efficient code. Besides, I
don't
use require statements, I use
$dbobject = singleton::getInstance('classname');
I don't use autoload because *I* want to be in control. I prefer not to
rely
on automatuic features which may not work as expected.
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
On Thu, May 28, 2009 at 9:49 AM, Tony Marston
t...@marston-home.demon.co.uk
wrote:
oorza...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:000e0cd6ad1a9f7d3d046af89...@google.com...
Two things:
1. Try using the fully qualified path (ie /var/www/foo/bar.php
instead
of
foo/bar.php)
2. Look at setting up autoloading so you don't need to manually
include
anyway. If you're going OOP, autoloading is a must!
I totally disagree. I have been doing OOP with PHP for years, and I
have
never used autoloading. It is just a feature that can be used, misused
or
abused just like any other. I choose not to use it, and my code does
not
suffer in the least!
--
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net
http://www.radicore.org
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP, OOP and AJAX
On Thu, 2009-05-28 at 16:17 +0300, Olexandr Heneralov wrote: Hi! Do not use low-level AJAX. There are many frameworks for ajax (JQUERY). Try to use PHP frameworks like symfony, zend framework. They simplify your work. 2009/5/28 Lenin le...@phpxperts.net 2009/5/28 kranthi kranthi...@gmail.com i recommend you firebug firefox adddon (just go to the net tab and you can see all the details of the communication between client and server) and i find it helpful to use a standard javascript(jQuery in my case) library instead of highly limited plain javascript language I also recommend using FirePHP with FireBug here's a nicely written tutorial on how to use them both together for Ajax'ed pages. http://tr.im/iyvl Thanks Lenin www.twitter.com/nine_L Real coders use low-level ajax... and code with rocks too ;) Ash www.ashleysheridan.co.uk -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP OOP
I don't think that PHP is good language for teaching OOP as many folks above said. I have never programmed in OOP style but i plan to learn it. I started in PHP but i was little confused and i am used to program in procedural way in PHP, so i've decided to learn some pure OOP language. I am reading a book OOP Demystified, there are examples in both C++ and Java. And imo Java code is much more readable and understandable. So i think that Java is the best for learning OOP. I am also considering learning C#, if you dont mind that it's closely related to windows, it might be also a good choice. -- tedd t...@sperling.com píse v diskusním príspevku news:p0624080dc5b5fff1c...@[192.168.1.101]... Hi gang: At the college where I teach, they are considering teaching OOP, but they don't want to settle on a specific language. My thoughts are it's difficult to teach OOP without a language -- while the general concepts of OOP are interesting, people need to see how concepts are applied to understand how they work -- thus I think a specific language is required I lean toward C++ because I wrote in it for a few years AND C++ appears to be the most common, widespread, and popular OOP language. However, while I don't know PHP OOP, I am open to considering it because of the proliferation of web based applications. My personal opinion is that's where all programming is headed anyway, but that's just my opinion. With that said, what's the differences and advantages/disadvantages between C++ and PHP OOP? Cheers, tedd -- --- http://sperling.com http://ancientstones.com http://earthstones.com -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
William N. Zanatta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is a known issue that function calls are expensive for the processor. The OOP let us better organize the code but, thinking in function (or method) calls it may be more expensive than in the procedural form. My question is, has anyone made any tests regarding the performance of OOP versus procedural language? Is it a good choice to code in OOP with PHP ? I would say, that web app model is so inefficient in itself, that you can hardly do anything to make things significantly worse or better performance wise. Also OOP is extensively used in other environments, and unless you are coding critical device drivers, it is rarely to expensive in terms of processing time. So my advice would be use OOP, and take benefit of better organization of your code. Just my 2c. rush -- http://www.templatetamer.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
In my experience OOP isn't any faster/slower. I've used it on sites that get 30M hits a month; so if it's gonna break I'd have seen it by now. One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT EVERYTHING BELONGS IN OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output HTML - you've skipped a few chapters in your OOP design books. OOP with PHP is lacking as far as complex application development (PHP5 looks to fix this), but it works great for base classes. I usually program CORE functionality in OOP (ie. Basket for e-commerce which keeps track of users' baskets). The rest of the code is procedural (ie. code that does basic math and organizes the page). --Joe -- Joe Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.joestump.net Label makers are proof God wants Sys Admins to be happy. -Original Message- From: rush [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:02 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance William N. Zanatta [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] It is a known issue that function calls are expensive for the processor. The OOP let us better organize the code but, thinking in function (or method) calls it may be more expensive than in the procedural form. My question is, has anyone made any tests regarding the performance of OOP versus procedural language? Is it a good choice to code in OOP with PHP ? I would say, that web app model is so inefficient in itself, that you can hardly do anything to make things significantly worse or better performance wise. Also OOP is extensively used in other environments, and unless you are coding critical device drivers, it is rarely to expensive in terms of processing time. So my advice would be use OOP, and take benefit of better organization of your code. Just my 2c. rush -- http://www.templatetamer.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT EVERYTHING BELONGS IN OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output HTML - you've skipped a few chapters in your OOP design books. Joe, I am curious about this opinion, could you elaborate a bit, please? I am not an OOP programmer, and I'm just interested in your thoughts on this, if you have time. Kirk -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
Sure ... I'm of the belief that OOP (in PHP anyways) has great use for core libraries. Core libraries, by their nature, generally don't output HTML. It's a core libraries job to separate logic and presentation. How portable is your library that outputs HTML for a guy who wants PDF/WAP/XML output? For instance, I have a product class that does various things to format product *data* prior to my procedural scripts putting it into my Smarty templates. If that product class outputted the data in HTML it would be useless to me for WAP users or a script that generated PDF versions of our online catalog. --Joe -- Joe Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.joestump.net Label makers are proof God wants Sys Admins to be happy. -Original Message- From: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:21 AM To: 'Joe Stump'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT EVERYTHING BELONGS IN OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output HTML - you've skipped a few chapters in your OOP design books. Joe, I am curious about this opinion, could you elaborate a bit, please? I am not an OOP programmer, and I'm just interested in your thoughts on this, if you have time. Kirk -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
Joe, I mostly agree with your opinion. But remember that a method in an object that has output doesn't have to print the output - it can return it instead and the calling function can then either display the output or do something else with it. And if it makes sense to have a method return HTML, another developer can override that method so that it returns XML. Or yet another method could take the HTML output of the first one and convert it to PDF. The question, I think, is about figuring out the most effective place to do what solves the problems. I'm afraid that saying You should never ever ever write an OOP method that has HTML in it's output is so rigid that it might make the development process more difficult and complex than it needs to be. Michael On Thu, 2003-05-29 at 11:28, Joe Stump wrote: Sure ... I'm of the belief that OOP (in PHP anyways) has great use for core libraries. Core libraries, by their nature, generally don't output HTML. It's a core libraries job to separate logic and presentation. How portable is your library that outputs HTML for a guy who wants PDF/WAP/XML output? For instance, I have a product class that does various things to format product *data* prior to my procedural scripts putting it into my Smarty templates. If that product class outputted the data in HTML it would be useless to me for WAP users or a script that generated PDF versions of our online catalog. --Joe -Original Message- From: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 8:21 AM To: 'Joe Stump'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance One thing I'd like to abundantly point out is that NOT EVERYTHING BELONGS IN OOP! For instance, if you're building classes that output HTML - you've skipped a few chapters in your OOP design books. Joe, I am curious about this opinion, could you elaborate a bit, please? I am not an OOP programmer, and I'm just interested in your thoughts on this, if you have time. Kirk -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
Joe Stump [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sure ... I'm of the belief that OOP (in PHP anyways) has great use for core libraries. Core libraries, by their nature, generally don't output HTML. It's a core libraries job to separate logic and presentation. How portable is your library that outputs HTML for a guy who wants PDF/WAP/XML output? For instance, I have a product class that does various things to format product *data* prior to my procedural scripts putting it into my Smarty templates. If that product class outputted the data in HTML it would be useless to me for WAP users or a script that generated PDF versions of our online catalog. Core libraries are of course first candidate for OOP, but I think there are many other places where you can use it successfully. Take for instance how it is used in TemplateTamer. In it, you define a class responsible for the generation of the page. In typicall usage you have a common class that all page classes inherit from, and which defines elements of page common to all pages on the site, and specific page classes implement only the parts they differ in. When the site grows, it is common to refine the hierarchy of page classes, so you have one page class on the top, then a few below it describing main sections of the site, and then on the bottom concrete page classes. Another OOP usage in TT can be in creating classes that represent GUI components. For instance on one site I have worked, I have created a JobAdForm object, that handles for reponsible displaying form and editing of JobAd object. Than when I needed similar but litle more extended version for superuser pages, I have just created a subclass SuperuserJobAdForm, and overided necessary parts, but inhertied 95% of code. So I think there is usage for OOP also in gui parts of the code, where it can also help better organization of code, and reuse between the pages or components on the same site. rush -- http://www.templatetamer.com/ -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
RE: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP x Procedural Performance
Hi, From my personal recent experience, I can tell you that processing a lot of echo's thru classes is a heck of a lot slower than just doing it the normal way. Although I wouldn't have done this particular project any other way, I do with that I could get it to display faster. Its not a big deal, just bugs me. Its really personal preference though. -Dan Joseph -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP OOP design question
Answer - use PEAR for both your database connection and as a data modeling layer: http://pear.php.net check the documentation for more info. neko Joseph Szobody [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I have several web projects that are all database driven. I have recently been diving into OOP, and rewriting a lot of procedural code in OOP. I have a design question about handling the MySQL connection. -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Re: [PHP] Re: PHP OOP
Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
I made a mistake while I was writting the example, in my original code I
wrote it as you did, with $this-b[0] = new one(); but it doesn't work.
Thank you.
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió en el mensaje
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Not tested, but what if you change
$b[0] = new one();
$b[1] = new one();
to:
$this-b[0] = new one();
$this-b[1] = new one();
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
I have a problem, I can't create an array of classes into a class, for
example:
class one {
var $a;
function foo() {
echo foo;
}
}
class two {
var $b;
function initialize() {
$b[0] = new one();
$b[1] = new one();
}
}
$test = new two();
$test-initialize();
$test-b[0]-foo(); //It doesn't work
$test-b[1]-foo(); //It doesn't work
Any suggestion?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
Eh.. unchecked code, but what about:
$this-b[0] = new one;
$this-b[1] = new one;
$test = new two;
Instead of
$this-b[0] = new one();
$this-b[1] = new one();
$test = new two();
If no luck try to include
error_reporting(E_ALL);
as first line of your script.
Good luck
René
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP OOP
Not tested, but what if you change
$b[0] = new one();
$b[1] = new one();
to:
$this-b[0] = new one();
$this-b[1] = new one();
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
I have a problem, I can't create an array of classes into a class, for
example:
class one {
var $a;
function foo() {
echo foo;
}
}
class two {
var $b;
function initialize() {
$b[0] = new one();
$b[1] = new one();
}
}
$test = new two();
$test-initialize();
$test-b[0]-foo(); //It doesn't work
$test-b[1]-foo(); //It doesn't work
Any suggestion?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP OOP
I made a mistake while I was writting the example, in my original code I
wrote it as you did, with $this-b[0] = new one(); but it doesn't work.
Thank you.
Philip Hallstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió en el mensaje
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Not tested, but what if you change
$b[0] = new one();
$b[1] = new one();
to:
$this-b[0] = new one();
$this-b[1] = new one();
On Tue, 3 Sep 2002, Rodrigo Dominguez wrote:
I have a problem, I can't create an array of classes into a class, for
example:
class one {
var $a;
function foo() {
echo foo;
}
}
class two {
var $b;
function initialize() {
$b[0] = new one();
$b[1] = new one();
}
}
$test = new two();
$test-initialize();
$test-b[0]-foo(); //It doesn't work
$test-b[1]-foo(); //It doesn't work
Any suggestion?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
[PHP] Re: PHP OOP list
Hello, On 07/23/2002 02:35 PM, Mathieu Dumoulin wrote: Is there a newsgroup list for PHP and OOP? It would be great to split up this large topic and create an OOP specific list. Sure, just send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or subscribe in this page: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/php-objects/join -- Regards, Manuel Lemos -- PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/) To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
