On Thu, August 23, 2007 2:49 pm, Instruct ICC wrote:
Can server1 receive a web page form post from remoteAttacker,
identify it as spam (or a DoS or DDoS attack),
hand off the socket to multiple threads on multiple servers owned by
server1's owner,
return multiple responses to remoteAttacker
On Thu, August 23, 2007 4:46 pm, Stut wrote:
Instruct ICC wrote:
Wow, that's for that egg-sucking lesson. I would think it was clear
from my answer that I know what a socket is.
Sorry. You understood the concept but it wasn't clear to me that
you
understood about the socket. Save me a
Instruct ICC wrote:
Because that means messing with the recipient list - that's donkey
work your client should do, hence my use of reply-to-all.
Wouldn't gmail thread it but still have 2 copies?
I could send email TO/CC/BCC the list to a specific folder, but I'd
still get the copy to me
Can server1 receive a web page form post from remoteAttacker,
identify it as spam (or a DoS or DDoS attack),
hand off the socket to multiple threads on multiple servers owned by
server1's owner,
return multiple responses to remoteAttacker which normally would have been a
single response
Instruct ICC wrote:
Can server1 receive a web page form post from remoteAttacker,
identify it as spam (or a DoS or DDoS attack),
hand off the socket to multiple threads on multiple servers owned by
server1's owner,
return multiple responses to remoteAttacker which normally would have
been a
Not sure what you mean by hand off the socket to multiple threads on
multiple servers. I think you're talking about detecting that a POST is
spam and passing that off to another machine to handle it.
Yes, that is what I meant. A socket is a lower level object that the web
server is using to
Instruct ICC wrote:
Not sure what you mean by hand off the socket to multiple threads on
multiple servers. I think you're talking about detecting that a POST
is spam and passing that off to another machine to handle it.
Yes, that is what I meant. A socket is a lower level object that the
web
Why don't you and others just reply to the list? (I'm smiling when I say
this.)
Wow, that's for that egg-sucking lesson. I would think it was clear from my
answer that I know what a socket is.
Sorry. You understood the concept but it wasn't clear to me that you
understood about the socket.
Instruct ICC wrote:
Why don't you and others just reply to the list? (I'm smiling when I
say this.)
Because that means messing with the recipient list - that's donkey work
your client should do, hence my use of reply-to-all.
Wow, that's for that egg-sucking lesson. I would think it was
Because that means messing with the recipient list - that's donkey work
your client should do, hence my use of reply-to-all.
Wouldn't gmail thread it but still have 2 copies?
I could send email TO/CC/BCC the list to a specific folder, but I'd still
get the copy to me directly in another folder.
10 matches
Mail list logo
