[PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jordi Canals
Hi,

I'm trying to understand how the intval() function works, but I'm
unable to understand how exactly it works.

Take a look at this piece of code (Tested on PHP 5.0.3):

?php

$a = (0.1 + 0.7) * 10;
$b = intval($a);

echo 'a - '. $a .' - '. gettype($a);  // Prints: a - 8 - double
echo 'br';
echo 'b - '. $b .' - '. gettype($b);  // Prints: b - 7 - integer

?

I also tested settype() and casting:

settype($a, 'integer'); // New value for $a is 7
$b = (int) $a;   // Value for $b is 7

I cannot understand it. If originally the value for $a is 8 (double),
why when converting to integer I get 7?

Any help or comment which helps me to understand that will be really welcome!
Jordi.

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Richard Lynch
Jordi Canals wrote:
 I'm trying to understand how the intval() function works, but I'm
 unable to understand how exactly it works.

Deep deep inside the guts of the computer, $a is represented as something
not unlike:

80e0

In other words, 8.0 x 10 to the 0th power.

Now, when the computer has to convert that to an integer, the mathematics
involved are, well, pretty complex.

Basically, you're looking at a good solid semester of college-level
courses in computer science to *really* dig into all the guts of binary,
ones-complement, twos-complement, and other internal representations.

Also note that the way things are *really* stored is platform/OS
dependent, so you could get different results from intval() on, say,
Windows and Linux and Mac (and whatever else PHP runs on).

You can be quite sure it will always be 7 or 8 for this example, as the
number internally will be very very very close to 7.99... or
8.000...

But (mostly) computers just don't think of decimal numbers and fractions
the same way you and I do, without some pretty special-purpose coding for
it.

Some real-world suggestions:

Use round(), floor() and ceil() as much as you can to convert if you are
worried about this kind of stuff.

If you *NEED* more precision for scientific purposes, the BC_MATH
extension lets *you* decide how many decimal points to keep around, and
you can get as precise as you want -- Up to the limits of the RAM on your
machine, and at a severe performance penalty compared to the built-in
OS-dependent math.

It should also be noted that there are languages (EG Lisp) which actually
*DO* understand fractions as part of the language specification, and which
just maybe might be more suitable for whatever it is you are doing if
PHP's math is frustrating you.  I suspect somebody somewhere has some
kind of fractional math package you could integate with PHP, though, if
you dig for it.

Keep in mind that it's not even really the way PHP thinks of numbers when
you are trying to figure out what intval() is doing -- It's built into the
hardware and the Operating System, and PHP pretty much just spits out
whatever the OS tells it to for intval().

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jochem Maas
Jordi Canals wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to understand how the intval() function works, but I'm
you'd think offhand that that would be easy
unable to understand how exactly it works.
hmm. very odd. I took a look at your code and did a few more tests
on PHP 5.0.2 (cli) (built: Oct 21 2004 13:52:27):
OUTPUT
$a = (0.1 + 0.7) * 10;var_dump($a);

float(8)
$b = intval($a);var_dump($b);

int(7)
$c = $a;settype($c, integer);var_dump($c);

int(7)
$d = intval($a);var_dump($d);

int(8)
$e = floatval($a);var_dump($e);

float(8)
$f = floatval($a);var_dump($f);

float(8)
$g = (int) floatval($a);var_dump($g);

int(7)
$h = $a;settype($h, integer);var_dump($h);

int(8)

var_dump($a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$f,$g,$h,$a);

float(8)
int(7)
int(7)
int(8)
float(8)
float(8)
int(7)
int(8)
string(1) 8
/OUTPUT
CMD-LINE-CODE
php -r '
$a = (0.1 + 0.7) * 10;
echo \n\$a = (0.1 + 0.7) * 10;var_dump(\$a);\n\n;
var_dump($a);
$b = intval($a);
echo \n\$b = intval(\$a);var_dump(\$b);\n\n;
var_dump($b);
$c = $a;settype($c, integer);
echo \n\$c = \$a;settype(\$c, \integer\);var_dump(\$c);\n\n;
var_dump($c);
$d = intval($a);
echo \n\$d = intval(\\$a\);var_dump(\$d);\n\n;
var_dump($d);
$e = floatval($a);
echo \n\$e = floatval(\$a);var_dump(\$e);\n\n;
var_dump($e);
$f = floatval($a);
echo \n\$f = floatval(\\$a\);var_dump(\$f);\n\n;
var_dump($f);
$g = (int) floatval($a);
echo \n\$g = (int) floatval(\$a);var_dump(\$g);\n\n;
var_dump($g);
$h = $a;settype($h, integer);
echo \n\$h = \$a;settype(\\$h\, \integer\);var_dump(\$h);\n\n;
var_dump($h);
echo 
\n\nvar_dump(\$a,\$b,\$c,\$d,\$e,\$f,\$g,\$h,\\$a\);\n\n;
var_dump($a,$b,$c,$d,$e,$f,$g,$h,$a);
'
/CMD-LINE-CODE
Take a look at this piece of code (Tested on PHP 5.0.3):
?php
$a = (0.1 + 0.7) * 10;
$b = intval($a);
echo 'a - '. $a .' - '. gettype($a);  // Prints: a - 8 - double
echo 'br';
echo 'b - '. $b .' - '. gettype($b);  // Prints: b - 7 - integer
sidenote: if you use double quotes in your test code you make it a
little easier for people to run the code off the cmdline ('php -r' on *nix).
?
I also tested settype() and casting:
settype($a, 'integer'); // New value for $a is 7
$b = (int) $a;   // Value for $b is 7
I cannot understand it. If originally the value for $a is 8 (double),
why when converting to integer I get 7?
my guess this is a round error issue - never noticed this problem before...
this is a problem right? anybody?
Any help or comment which helps me to understand that will be really 
welcome!
Jordi.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jochem Maas
Richard Lynch wrote:
Jordi Canals wrote:
I'm trying to understand how the intval() function works, but I'm
unable to understand how exactly it works.

Deep deep inside the guts of the computer, $a is represented as something
not unlike:
...
thanks Richard for that explaination! lots of light bulbs just went on.
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Richard Lynch
 my guess this is a round error issue - never noticed this problem
 before...
 this is a problem right? anybody?

You can say it is a round error issue.

You can not say it is a problem.

You simply have to be aware that the float number which you think of as
8.... inside of PHP may well be represented as
7.... down in the guts of the machine.

It may help you feel better about this if you recall from grade school
mathematics, that, in point of fact:
7.999... is EXACTLY equal to 8.000...

Those who doubt this fact are requested to remember how to convert
decimals such as:
0.333...
to fractions (1/3), and then apply that exact same method to 7.999...

You will quickly find yourself with a fraction (72/9) which is precisely
equal to 8/1 which is 8.

EVERY floating point number, then, that ends in x000... has a second
representation, exactly equal, which ends in (x-1)999...

Bottom line, however you look at it, is that you can NEVER be 100% certain
that a computer's float number will convert to what you expect in an
integer because their internal representation simply does not allow for
perfection.

This is a feature, not a bug. :-)

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Bruce Douglas
so...

you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0

i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical purposes 
the same, they are in fact vastly different...

so, prove your assertion...

-bruce


-Original Message-
From: Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 25, 2005 2:57 PM
To: Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jordi Canals [EMAIL PROTECTED], PHP List php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

 my guess this is a round error issue - never noticed this problem
 before...
 this is a problem right? anybody?

You can say it is a round error issue.

You can not say it is a problem.

You simply have to be aware that the float number which you think of as
8.... inside of PHP may well be represented as
7.... down in the guts of the machine.

It may help you feel better about this if you recall from grade school
mathematics, that, in point of fact:
7.999... is EXACTLY equal to 8.000...

Those who doubt this fact are requested to remember how to convert
decimals such as:
0.333...
to fractions (1/3), and then apply that exact same method to 7.999...

You will quickly find yourself with a fraction (72/9) which is precisely
equal to 8/1 which is 8.

EVERY floating point number, then, that ends in x000... has a second
representation, exactly equal, which ends in (x-1)999...

Bottom line, however you look at it, is that you can NEVER be 100% certain
that a computer's float number will convert to what you expect in an
integer because their internal representation simply does not allow for
perfection.

This is a feature, not a bug. :-)

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Bret Hughes
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 17:29, Bruce Douglas wrote:
 so...
 
 you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0
 
 i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical purposes 
 the same, they are in fact vastly different...
 
 so, prove your assertion...
 
 -bruce
 
Check out this one:

http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.0..html

Bret

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jochem Maas
Bruce Douglas wrote:
so...
you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0
i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical purposes 
the same, they are in fact vastly different...
so, prove your assertion...
he did.
you have to consider the two the same, given that there is always a limit to the
level of precision - the alternative would be to say no 2 numbers are ever 
equal and
that make for boring mathematics.
actually the underlying maths kinda makes my head spin :-)
-bruce
-Original Message-
From: Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 25, 2005 2:57 PM
To: Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jordi Canals [EMAIL PROTECTED], PHP List php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

my guess this is a round error issue - never noticed this problem
before...
this is a problem right? anybody?

You can say it is a round error issue.
You can not say it is a problem.
You simply have to be aware that the float number which you think of as
8.... inside of PHP may well be represented as
7.... down in the guts of the machine.
It may help you feel better about this if you recall from grade school
mathematics, that, in point of fact:
7.999... is EXACTLY equal to 8.000...
Those who doubt this fact are requested to remember how to convert
decimals such as:
0.333...
to fractions (1/3), and then apply that exact same method to 7.999...
You will quickly find yourself with a fraction (72/9) which is precisely
equal to 8/1 which is 8.
EVERY floating point number, then, that ends in x000... has a second
representation, exactly equal, which ends in (x-1)999...
Bottom line, however you look at it, is that you can NEVER be 100% certain
that a computer's float number will convert to what you expect in an
integer because their internal representation simply does not allow for
perfection.
This is a feature, not a bug. :-)
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Richard Lynch
Bruce Douglas wrote:
 so...

 you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0

 i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical
 purposes the same, they are in fact vastly different...

 so, prove your assertion...

Claim:
7.... (repeating) is EXACTLY equal to 8.  Period.

Remember converting repeating decimals to fractions back in 5th grade?

Convert 0.33... to a fraction.

Let x = 0.33...
10x = 3....

10x =  3.333...
- x = -0.333...
=
 9x =  3
  x = 3/9
  x = 1/3

You did that, right?


Okay, now try it with 7....

Let x = 7....
10x = 79.9...


10x = 79.99...
- x = -7.999...
=
 9x = 72
 x = 72/9
 x = 8

QED

You can do this with *ANY* repeating decimal to get a fractional
respresentation EXACTLY equal to that repeating decimal.

x = 0....

10x = 6.
- x = -.
===
 9x = 6
  x = 6/9
  x = 2/3

All rules of mathematics prove these are EXACTLY equal.

Not close.  EQUAL.

TRY IT!

0.2
0.4
0.1212121212121212 (You have to use 100x on this one)

You get the fraction which is EQUAL to the repeating decimal.

Now go for:

0.
1.9
2.99
0.599
0.123499

If it ends in ???x99 you *WILL* find out that there is a
corresponding ???(x-1)00... to match it.

I *KNOW* it seems counter-intuitive, but there it is.

PS
I've often wondered why Cantor's Diagonal Theorom never bothered to take
this into account -- Sure, you could always just pick a non-9 and non-0
digit instead of just the 'next' digit, but...  A contrived
counter-example to Cantor's Diagonal Theorom is trivial to create and
dis-prove it as it is written in most textbooks.  Oh well.  Somebody
Else's Problem.

This is sooo off-topic!

But it does sort of point out that even in the mathematics you've used
every single day of your life, things are not always what they seem.

It's just even more not what they seem inside a computer using PHP. :-)

PPS
Don't take my word for it.  There are only a few zillion mathematicians
and/or 5th-graders who can provide an abundance of examples. :-) :-) :-)

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jason Barnett
Bruce Douglas wrote:
no..
he didn't.
Yes he did... he just used calculus to do it.  I'm not going to give a 
full calculus lesson here (you can google for that), but basically the 
limit of 0.999 (repeating) as you go towards *infinity* decimal 
places is 1

8.0 = 8.0
7. (repeating) = 7. (repeating)
8.0 != 7. (repeating)
In this case it is like 7 + 1 = 7 + .999 (repeating)
Which goes to 1 = . (repeating)
Which is true, if you know the calculus involved here.  Seriously, 
google for it.

now, if you want to get into conversations with regards to internal binary 
representations because of the limits of the register architecture in 
computers, then i might say the issue is the fact that the algorithms employed 
within the hardware are flawed...
but let's not start screwing with basic math theory
I wouldn't call it basic... but calculus is indeed a theory.  Heck it 
might even be on the level of containing mathematical axioms, but I 
don't know that for sure ;)

the statement that he uses where he states that there is a limit to the level of precision is lazy at best... (from a mathmatical perspective)  or can i simply say, 15000 = 14,800 based upon my level of precision
Not limit to precision... limit as you approach infinity.  It assumes 
*no* arbitrary cutoff point of precision... whereas most OS's do indeed 
cut off after X number of decimal places.

-bruce


--
Teach a man to fish...
NEW? | http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
STFA | http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
STFM | http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
STFW | http://www.google.com/search?q=php
LAZY | 
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=PHPsubmitform=Find+search+plugins

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Richard Lynch
Jochem Maas wrote:
 Bruce Douglas wrote:
 so...

 you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0

 i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical
 purposes the same, they are in fact vastly different...

 so, prove your assertion...

 he did.

 you have to consider the two the same, given that there is always a limit
 to the
 level of precision - the alternative would be to say no 2 numbers are ever
 equal and
 that make for boring mathematics.

No, no, no.

I'm going MUCH farther than that.

I've claimed (and proved) that:

7.999... (repeating decimal)

IS EXACTLY EQUAL TO

8.000... (repeating decimal)

with absolutely no computer, rounding, fudging, or nothing about being
close involved.

They are EQUAL.

If you don't believe me, you merely need to convert a bunch of repeating
decimals to fractions the same as any grade-school kid would do, and then
you'll see.

Honest!

I'm not making this [bleep] up. :-)

PS  BS in Honors Mathematics from Notre Dame is my qualification... 
Though any 5th-grade teacher can prove it just as fast as I can.  Faster,
actually, as they go through it every year, and have the same disbelief
from their students as I'm seeing here.  Go find a 5th-grade teacher and
ask 'em. :-) :-) :-)

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jason Barnett
Richard Lynch wrote:
Jochem Maas wrote:
Bruce Douglas wrote:
so...
you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0
i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical
purposes the same, they are in fact vastly different...
so, prove your assertion...
he did.
you have to consider the two the same, given that there is always a limit
to the
level of precision - the alternative would be to say no 2 numbers are ever
equal and
that make for boring mathematics.

No, no, no.
I'm going MUCH farther than that.
I've claimed (and proved) that:
7.999... (repeating decimal)
IS EXACTLY EQUAL TO
8.000... (repeating decimal)
somewhat-back-on-topic
So knowing this... is the fractional math how the BC Math extension for 
PHP works?  I'm really curious now.  It certainly makes things more 
clear for me if this is the case.
/somewhat-back-on-topic

--
Teach a man to fish...
NEW? | http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
STFA | http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
STFM | http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
STFW | http://www.google.com/search?q=php
LAZY | 
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=PHPsubmitform=Find+search+plugins

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Richard Lynch
 somewhat-back-on-topic
 So knowing this... is the fractional math how the BC Math extension for
 PHP works?  I'm really curious now.  It certainly makes things more
 clear for me if this is the case.
 /somewhat-back-on-topic

Somewhat.

I'd more describe it as:

You pick how many decimal points you want BC_MATH to use, and BC_MATH
will juggle the string representations of your numbers to keep that many
decimals valid

So if you choose 10 decimal points, BC_MATH will represent 0.999... as:

0.99

and 1 as 1.00 and then it will add/subtract/multiply with that
many decimal points.

For scientific usage, to keep your rounding correct you always use an
extra decimal place than you are claiming as your accuracy, so that any
round-off errors happen in a decimal place you're not pretending is
correct.

Note that all the operations happen as string-parsing, so you're basically
limited to the size of your RAM for your strings to fit.

And, as you might imagine, it is NOT going to be anything like as fast as
using built-in operators, since it has to munge all the strings to get
answers.

If you're an astrophysicist or a nuclear researcher, you NEED that
precision, though.

YMMV (but not by more than N decimal places)
:-)

-- 
Like Music?
http://l-i-e.com/artists.htm

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jason Barnett
Jochem Maas wrote:
Bruce Douglas wrote:
so...
you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0
i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical 
purposes the same, they are in fact vastly different...

so, prove your assertion...

he did.
you have to consider the two the same, given that there is always a 
limit to the
level of precision - the alternative would be to say no 2 numbers are 
ever equal and
that make for boring mathematics.

actually the underlying maths kinda makes my head spin :-)
Calculus, or did I miss something here?  In any case it was a cool link 
all the same and I enjoyed reading it.  Float - int conversions have 
been a problem in every language that I've coded in.

--
Teach a man to fish...
NEW? | http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
STFA | http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalw=2
STFM | http://www.php.net/manual/en/index.php
STFW | http://www.google.com/search?q=php
LAZY | 
http://mycroft.mozdev.org/download.html?name=PHPsubmitform=Find+search+plugins

--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php


Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Bruce Douglas
no..

he didn't.

8.0 = 8.0

7. (repeating) = 7. (repeating)

8.0 != 7. (repeating)

now, if you want to get into conversations with regards to internal binary 
representations because of the limits of the register architecture in 
computers, then i might say the issue is the fact that the algorithms employed 
within the hardware are flawed...

but let's not start screwing with basic math theory

the statement that he uses where he states that there is a limit to the level 
of precision is lazy at best... (from a mathmatical perspective)  or can i 
simply say, 15000 = 14,800 based upon my level of precision

-bruce



-Original Message-
From: Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Jan 25, 2005 3:42 PM
To: Bruce Douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Jordi Canals [EMAIL PROTECTED], 
PHP List php-general@lists.php.net
Subject: Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

Bruce Douglas wrote:
 so...
 
 you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0
 
 i say prove it..  as i recall the numbers might be for all practical purposes 
 the same, they are in fact vastly different...
 
 so, prove your assertion...

he did.

you have to consider the two the same, given that there is always a limit to the
level of precision - the alternative would be to say no 2 numbers are ever 
equal and
that make for boring mathematics.

actually the underlying maths kinda makes my head spin :-)

 
 -bruce
 
 
 -Original Message-
 From: Richard Lynch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Jan 25, 2005 2:57 PM
 To: Jochem Maas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Cc: Jordi Canals [EMAIL PROTECTED], PHP List php-general@lists.php.net
 Subject: Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion
 
 
my guess this is a round error issue - never noticed this problem
before...
this is a problem right? anybody?
 
 
 You can say it is a round error issue.
 
 You can not say it is a problem.
 
 You simply have to be aware that the float number which you think of as
 8.... inside of PHP may well be represented as
 7.... down in the guts of the machine.
 
 It may help you feel better about this if you recall from grade school
 mathematics, that, in point of fact:
 7.999... is EXACTLY equal to 8.000...
 
 Those who doubt this fact are requested to remember how to convert
 decimals such as:
 0.333...
 to fractions (1/3), and then apply that exact same method to 7.999...
 
 You will quickly find yourself with a fraction (72/9) which is precisely
 equal to 8/1 which is 8.
 
 EVERY floating point number, then, that ends in x000... has a second
 representation, exactly equal, which ends in (x-1)999...
 
 Bottom line, however you look at it, is that you can NEVER be 100% certain
 that a computer's float number will convert to what you expect in an
 integer because their internal representation simply does not allow for
 perfection.
 
 This is a feature, not a bug. :-)
 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Robert Cummings
On Tue, 2005-01-25 at 18:29, Bruce Douglas wrote:
 so...
 
 you're saying that 7.9 (repeating) is equal to 8.0

I do believe that the limit as the number of repeating 9s aproaches
infinity is indeed 8.

Cheers,
Rob.
-- 
..
| InterJinn Application Framework - http://www.interjinn.com |
::
| An application and templating framework for PHP. Boasting  |
| a powerful, scalable system for accessing system services  |
| such as forms, properties, sessions, and caches. InterJinn |
| also provides an extremely flexible architecture for   |
| creating re-usable components quickly and easily.  |
`'

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php



Re: [PHP] Understanding intval() and types conversion

2005-01-25 Thread Jochem Maas
Maybe its time to kill this thread?
I think Jason and Richard (others) have done a brilliant
job of explaining how AND why, many thanks to them.
Anyone not yet convinced should probably take a maths course ]
(i.e. pay someone for the teachings ;-)
rgds,
Jochem
Jason Barnett wrote:
Bruce Douglas wrote:
no..
he didn't.

...
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php