Hello -
I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
some php library are not compatible with multi-threading.
But php 5 ?
Best regards,
Fred -
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
(prefork MPM).
worker MPM could be a problem though...
regrds,
Bostjan
On Thursday 23 of September 2004 10:28, Frédéric Hardy wrote:
Hello -
I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:33:54 +0200, Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com
We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
(prefork MPM).
I also have PHP 5 and Apache 2 running on some servers, as I need some
Apache Modules that are only available for Apache 2 ... Also, I
Hello,
And following the last line - I'm still running Apache2 with PHP5 on
Windows on an increasing number of sites, without a single problem to
date ;)
I switched to Apache 2 and PHP 5.0.0 a week ago and hand no problems so
far (several hundred thousand hits each day). Apache 2 is running
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
When I started playing with this, I had a windows machine onto which I
tried installing Apache1. After a couple of days of
Curt Zirzow wrote:
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many problems.
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-devm=108736540021355w=2
It was this or another message
Why is there such a reluctance to using Apache 2? For stability issues,
PHP should recommend Apache 2 but in prefork mode. Instead of saying
Apache 2 is unsupported, just say non prefork mode is not supported.
Additionally, if PHP is more acceptable of Apache 2 (in the supported
mode
Would it be just fine if I activated Apache2's 'prefork' module? I know
preforking defeats Apache2 purpose, but I am still wondering if it should
still work fine. :)
Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Wow! And come to think of it,
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Thanks and Cheers!
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
Live free() or die().
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too
* Thus wrote raditha dissanayake:
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2
At 18:55 19-7-04, you wrote:
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too
Chris Hayes wrote:
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-devm=108736540021355w=2
Very well explained. Untill now this problem was explained to me with a
lot of techno mumbo jumbo, and I could not make sense of it. But now I
think I really understand what's going
Hi,
I just wanted to post almost the same question: PHP for Apache 2 is
idling around for years now. configure --with-apxs2 is still marked as
[EXPERIMENTAL] and the documentation still warns:
Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on
Unix nor on Windows.
What
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
You can, if it works for you, but ...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalm=107916708217647w=2
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
You can, if it works for you, but ...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalm=107916708217647w=2
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Apache2 had been well
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
Live free() or die().
Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Thus wrote Oliver John V. Tibi:
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
I would stay with stick with apache 1.x.
The only reason I would consider apache2 is if there was a module
only available
Hello there,
Does someone know if Apache 2 support in PHP is stable when using Apache
2 as prcoess spawning only, I mean, no threads.
Somebody has seen performance improvements in Apache 2 when compared to
Apache 1.3??
I know it is experimental because of the threads configuration in the
new
I recently upgraded to apache 2.0 from 1.23.x on my server. Previously,
I had sessions working using the database to store session information.
I recently noticed that this is no longer working as it did. The
sessions are still working, however, the session information is not
being transfered via
--- Christopher Ditty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded to apache 2.0 from 1.23.x on my server.
1.3.x you mean? :-)
The sessions are still working, however, the session information is
not being transfered via the url.
[snip]
session.use_trans_sid = 0
There's your answer. Hope
Thanks Chris. I just compared the trans_sid on the dev box and it is
set to 1. I'll make that change and report in. Many thanks. Owe you
another beer if that was it. ;)
Chris
Chris Shiflett [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/26/04 10:41AM
--- Christopher Ditty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently
A few months back the official PHP website still warned againts PHP and
Apache 2. I am wondering about the current status of these two technologies
when used together. I am about to configure a web server and was going to
use Apache 1.3 with PHP4+ as opposed to Apache 2 with PHP4+. What are your
Hi!
When I am laoding php as module:
LoadModule php4_module c:/php/sapi/php4apache2.dll
I get the following error:
Apache.exe: module c:\php4build\snap\sapi\apache2filter\sapi_apache2.c is not
compatible with this version of Apache (found 20020628, need 20020903).
Please contact the vendor for
:06 PM
Subject: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP 4.2.3.
Hi!
When I am laoding php as module:
LoadModule php4_module c:/php/sapi/php4apache2.dll
I get the following error:
Apache.exe: module c:\php4build\snap\sapi\apache2filter\sapi_apache2.c
is not
compatible with this version of Apache (found
Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
environments. Are there any further updates?
What is the best way to keep up on the status of this? Any good sites in
particular?
TIA
Kirk
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http
I heard mentioning a few more month for them to get working stably.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnson, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
environments. Are there any further updates?
What is the best way to keep
this?
Best regards,
Davy Obdam
mailto:info;davyobdam.com
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:kjohnson;zootweb.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet
Thanks for your reply, Davy. We are running *nix boxes, so I don't have any
thoughts on XP and Apache.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: Davy Obdam [mailto:info;davyobdam.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Johnson, Kirk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Apache 2
instead of 1.3.x. Whats your opinion about
this?
Best regards,
Davy Obdam
mailto:info;davyobdam.com
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: Johnson, Kirk [mailto:kjohnson;zootweb.com]
Verzonden: donderdag 7 november 2002 16:26
Aan: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Onderwerp: [PHP] Apache 2 and PHP
At http://www.php.net/ChangeLog-4.php#4.2.0 there is a note (Note: Apache2
support is EXPERIMENTAL.)
Is this note still justified for PHP/4.2.2? Is it about security?
--
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, visit: http://www.php.net/unsub.php
31 matches
Mail list logo
