On 1/09/2011, at 8:43 PM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
> Simon J Welsh writes:
>> On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
>>> Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie:
On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
> var_dump((
Le 01/09/2011 10:43, magic-...@damage.devloop.de a écrit :
Simon J Welsh writes:
On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie:
On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
var_dump((float)"8315e839da08
Simon J Welsh writes:
On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie:
On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
var_dump((float)"8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d");
results in float(INF)
The cast t
On 1/09/2011, at 9:53 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
> Am Mittwoch, 31. August 2011, 20:48:37 schrieb Shawn McKenzie:
>> On 08/31/2011 09:03 AM, magic-...@damage.devloop.de wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> I have opend Bug #51739 in 2010. It was closed as bogus before my last
>>> question was answered.
Hi,
I have opend Bug #51739 in 2010. It was closed as bogus before my last
question was answered. It would be fine to know what you think about that
bug.
In short:
var_dump((float)"8315e839da08e2a7afe6dd12ec58245d");
results in float(INF)
This is because "8315" is treated as base and
"e8
5 matches
Mail list logo