Hello,
Richard Ellerbrock wrote:
> >> I have done MySQL (MyISAM, INNODB), PostgreSQL and Oracle 9i with AdoDB
> >> - see http://iptrack.sourceforge.net. Works just fine for me. The
> >> hardest part was to get around limitations of certain databases - like
> >> Oracle does no support record count
On Sun, 21 Apr 2002 00:54:39 +0200, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Richard Ellerbrock wrote:
>> > If you want to hear experiences of people that tried Metabase, try
>> > asking in Metabase mailing list (
>> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metabase-dev/ ) or BinaryCloud mailing
>> > lists ( htt
Hello,
Richard Ellerbrock wrote:
> > If you want to hear experiences of people that tried Metabase, try
> > asking in Metabase mailing list (
> > http://groups.yahoo.com/group/metabase-dev/ ) or BinaryCloud mailing
> > lists ( http://binarycloud.tigris.org/servlets/ProjectMailingListList ).
> > I
PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 20, 2002 8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [PHP] Re: [PHP-DB] Re: [PHP] Re: Cross DB application
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:05:13 +0200, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sp wrote:
>>
>> Hi Manuel, I still don't see a problem in others telli
On Thu, 18 Apr 2002 16:05:13 +0200, Manuel Lemos wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Sp wrote:
>>
>> Hi Manuel, I still don't see a problem in others telling their
>> experiences with certain packages. If someone has just used metabase
>> or has just used adodb then I would like to hear how easy/hard it was
>
Hello,
Sp wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel, I still don't see a problem in others telling their experiences
> with certain packages. If someone has just used metabase or has just used
> adodb then I would like to hear how easy/hard it was to port to another
> database.
Sure, but what I meant is that since
Hi Manuel, I still don't see a problem in others telling their experiences
with certain packages. If someone has just used metabase or has just used
adodb then I would like to hear how easy/hard it was to port to another
database.
-Original Message-
From: Manuel Lemos [mailto:[EMAIL PR
Hello,
Sp wrote:
>
> Can someone with database expertise who has used metabase and adodb cut
> through this rhetoric and give an objective view of these two packages.
> From what I got from this convo is that metabase is slower but more portable
> but adodb is faster but not as portable.
No, Me
Hello,
Sp wrote:
>
> Can someone with database expertise who has used metabase and adodb cut
> through this rhetoric and give an objective view of these two packages.
> From what I got from this convo is that metabase is slower but more portable
> but adodb is faster but not as portable.
No, Me
There must be people on this list that have ported their web apps from
different databases and could share their experiences.
mysql <-> postesql
mysql <-> ms sql server
ms sql server <-> oracle
-Original Message-
From: John Lim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: April 17,
10 matches
Mail list logo
