Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 05:23:10PM -0500 in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Bill Kearney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> spake:
>Unless, of course, you need real text encoding.
>XML-RPC *only* supports USASCII. No unicode, not even ISO-8859-1. And it's
>spec author actively fights /against/ improving this situation.
An
Unless, of course, you need real text encoding.
XML-RPC *only* supports USASCII. No unicode, not even ISO-8859-1. And it's
spec author actively fights /against/ improving this situation.
-Bill Kearney
"Tony Bibbs" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> That seems network
That seems network intensive to me. Offering web services for some basic
tasks makes sense but not making an entire application that does all
functionality over the web will be slow and impractical.
Also, consider XML-RPC. Some people insist on hammering a nail with a
sledgehammer (soap) when
You could also check into a RSS implementation. Take the standardized
approach to XML-RPC.
http://backend.userland.com/rss
- Paul
-Original Message-
From: Tony Bibbs [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 4:23 PM
To: Merlin
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subje
4 matches
Mail list logo
