Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-21 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, Stephano Mariani wrote: > > I believe fork is very expensive in terms of performance. > One should consider that in the case of server modules (ISAPI in > particular) a huge overhead is incurred when forking. I better > alternative would be the vfork call. Or better still, the __clone cal

Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-21 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, Rouvas Stathis wrote: > > Manuel Lemos wrote: > > > > > > For example, multi-threading. Looking at the PHP sources, I can see this > > > > would be fairly easy to implement on some most server modules. Before I > > > > get fried by people for suggesting this, I know there are many functio

Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-21 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, Vincent Stoessel wrote: > > I did not know that, thank you for the info. > I just downloaded phpIDE beta and I am highly impressed with the > debugger. It say that it can do remote debugging as well. That sounds cool > but I wonder how secure it is. Zend folks, I apologize for taking so l

RE: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-21 Thread Stephano Mariani
:21 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php Manuel Lemos wrote: > > > > For example, multi-threading. Looking at the PHP sources, I can > > > see this would be fairly easy to implement on some most server > > >

Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-21 Thread Rouvas Stathis
Manuel Lemos wrote: > > > > For example, multi-threading. Looking at the PHP sources, I can see this > > > would be fairly easy to implement on some most server modules. Before I > > > get fried by people for suggesting this, I know there are many functions > > > that are not thread safe, such th

Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-20 Thread Vincent Stoessel
I did not know that, thank you for the info. I just downloaded phpIDE beta and I am highly impressed with the debugger. It say that it can do remote debugging as well. That sounds cool but I wonder how secure it is. Zend folks, I apologize for taking so long to try out this product, it's great!

Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-20 Thread Manuel Lemos
Hello, Vincent Stoessel wrote: > > I would love to see a decent debugger like perl has. > Nothing is more frustrating then having to echo and die() > to debug code. Especially when you are assigned the task of > updating code from a developer that has long gone without > leaving any documentatio

Re: [PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-20 Thread Vincent Stoessel
I would love to see a decent debugger like perl has. Nothing is more frustrating then having to echo and die() to debug code. Especially when you are assigned the task of updating code from a developer that has long gone without leaving any documentation. Stephano Mariani wrote: > Hi! > > I hav

[PHP] Suggestions for the next php

2001-12-20 Thread Stephano Mariani
Hi! I have been a PHP user since version 3.0 came out, and have seen it develop a lot along the way, but theres some things I find it lacks that it really should not. If people agree, I'll glady contribute to the PHP codebase. For example, multi-threading. Looking at the PHP sources, I can see t