-Original Message-
> From: John Hicks [mailto:johnl...@gulfbridge.net]
> Sent: Friday, November 12, 2010 12:11 PM
> To: php-general@lists.php.net
> Subject: Re: [PHP] php running as module or cgi?
>
> On 11/11/2010 02:14 PM, Didier Gasser-Morlay wrote:
> > On 11/1
On 11/11/2010 02:14 PM, Didier Gasser-Morlay wrote:
On 11/11/2010 12:04 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 11 November 2010 00:46, Al wrote:
Briefly, what are the trade offs on a typical shared host?
I've done a little research and can't seem to find anything outstanding
either way.
Seems like a
On 11/11/2010 12:04 PM, Richard Quadling wrote:
On 11 November 2010 00:46, Al wrote:
Briefly, what are the trade offs on a typical shared host?
I've done a little research and can't seem to find anything outstanding
either way.
Seems like as an Apache module is faster. This argument makes sen
On 11 November 2010 00:46, Al wrote:
> Briefly, what are the trade offs on a typical shared host?
>
> I've done a little research and can't seem to find anything outstanding
> either way.
>
> Seems like as an Apache module is faster. This argument makes sense.
>
> CGI is more secure, this argument
On 11 November 2010 00:46, Al wrote:
> Briefly, what are the trade offs on a typical shared host?
>
> I've done a little research and can't seem to find anything outstanding
> either way.
>
> Seems like as an Apache module is faster. This argument makes sense.
>
> CGI is more secure, this argument
Briefly, what are the trade offs on a typical shared host?
I've done a little research and can't seem to find anything outstanding either
way.
Seems like as an Apache module is faster. This argument makes sense.
CGI is more secure, this argument doesn't seem too persuasive to me. Maybe I'm
mi
6 matches
Mail list logo