We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
(prefork MPM).
worker MPM could be a problem though...
regrds,
Bostjan
On Thursday 23 of September 2004 10:28, Frédéric Hardy wrote:
Hello -
I known that using apache 2 with php 4.x is not a good idea, because
On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 10:33:54 +0200, Bostjan Skufca @ domenca.com
We use php4 and php5 with apache2 on production servers without any problem
(prefork MPM).
I also have PHP 5 and Apache 2 running on some servers, as I need some
Apache Modules that are only available for Apache 2 ... Also, I
Hello,
And following the last line - I'm still running Apache2 with PHP5 on
Windows on an increasing number of sites, without a single problem to
date ;)
I switched to Apache 2 and PHP 5.0.0 a week ago and hand no problems so
far (several hundred thousand hits each day). Apache 2 is running in
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
When I started playing with this, I had a windows machine onto which I
tried installing Apache1. After a couple of days of
Curt Zirzow wrote:
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too many problems.
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-devm=108736540021355w=2
It was this or another message by
Why is there such a reluctance to using Apache 2? For stability issues,
PHP should recommend Apache 2 but in prefork mode. Instead of saying
Apache 2 is unsupported, just say non prefork mode is not supported.
Additionally, if PHP is more acceptable of Apache 2 (in the supported
mode), then
Would it be just fine if I activated Apache2's 'prefork' module? I know
preforking defeats Apache2 purpose, but I am still wondering if it should
still work fine. :)
Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Wow! And come to think of it,
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too
* Thus wrote raditha dissanayake:
Oliver John V. Tibi wrote:
Hi!
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2
At 18:55 19-7-04, you wrote:
I was wondering if there are already results from any benchmark that says
Apache 2 and PHP are ready for production environments.
Don't know about benchmarks don't bother with them, but we were using
PHP and apache 2 on a production server and it just had too
Chris Hayes wrote:
And for a longer explaination:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-devm=108736540021355w=2
Very well explained. Untill now this problem was explained to me with a
lot of techno mumbo jumbo, and I could not make sense of it. But now I
think I really understand what's going
Hi,
I just wanted to post almost the same question: PHP for Apache 2 is
idling around for years now. configure --with-apxs2 is still marked as
[EXPERIMENTAL] and the documentation still warns:
Do not use Apache 2.0 and PHP in a production environment neither on
Unix nor on Windows.
What is
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
You can, if it works for you, but ...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalm=107916708217647w=2
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Open Source Software Systems
On Tuesday 20 July 2004 03:22, Marten Lehmann wrote:
Why shouldn't I use PHP 5.0.0 with Apache 2.0.50?
You can, if it works for you, but ...
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=php-generalm=107916708217647w=2
--
Jason Wong - Gremlins Associates - www.gremlins.biz
Apache2 had been well
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
--
Running 'ojtibi' on '127.0.0.1' (BATCH_OPTIMISTIC mode).
Live free() or die().
Lester Caine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
* Thus wrote Oliver John V. Tibi:
Wow! And come to think of it, how did you do it? Or should I stick with
Apache1 until there is a viable solution to this upgrade dilemma?
I would stay with stick with apache 1.x.
The only reason I would consider apache2 is if there was a module
only available
--- Christopher Ditty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently upgraded to apache 2.0 from 1.23.x on my server.
1.3.x you mean? :-)
The sessions are still working, however, the session information is
not being transfered via the url.
[snip]
session.use_trans_sid = 0
There's your answer. Hope
Thanks Chris. I just compared the trans_sid on the dev box and it is
set to 1. I'll make that change and report in. Many thanks. Owe you
another beer if that was it. ;)
Chris
Chris Shiflett [EMAIL PROTECTED] 03/26/04 10:41AM
--- Christopher Ditty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I recently
In short - looks as if your version of Apache 2 is out of date.
You're using a version from 28th June, the PHP dll was built against a
version from 3rd September.
Danny.
- Original Message -
From: Horst Gassner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 16, 2002
I heard mentioning a few more month for them to get working stably.
--
Maxim Maletsky
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johnson, Kirk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote... :
Last I heard, PHP and Apache 2 were not yet ready for production
environments. Are there any further updates?
What is the best way to keep
Hi Kirk,.
I run apache 2.0.40 and PHP 4.2.3 without no problem on my windows XP
machine. I use it for testing, but i would think its stable enough for a
production environment aswell. I actualy think that on a win32 platform
Apache 2 is a better choice instead of 1.3.x. Whats your opinion about
Thanks for your reply, Davy. We are running *nix boxes, so I don't have any
thoughts on XP and Apache.
Kirk
-Original Message-
From: Davy Obdam [mailto:info;davyobdam.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 07, 2002 3:29 PM
To: Johnson, Kirk; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [PHP] Apache 2
Hi,
I use Apache 2.0.4 and PHP 4.2.3 on Mandrake Linux and Win XP. On Linux its
been extremely stable and havnt had a single problem yet, on XP I have a few
minor problems to where the PHP was executing slow but nothing majorly
noticable.
Davy Obdam [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
23 matches
Mail list logo
