On 5/27/10 3:15 PM, Adam Richardson wrote:
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Waynn Lue wrote:
I've seen @inheritDoc used in Java before, though I'm not sure about
the php support.
Waynn
You're absolutely right, Waynn,
Phpdocumentor has this, too:
http://manual.phpdoc.org/HTMLSmartyConvert
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Waynn Lue wrote:
> I've seen @inheritDoc used in Java before, though I'm not sure about
> the php support.
>
> Waynn
>
> On 5/27/10, Adam Richardson wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> > Larry,
> >> >
> >> > I've thought about this very issue before (java developers sometimes
I've seen @inheritDoc used in Java before, though I'm not sure about
the php support.
Waynn
On 5/27/10, Adam Richardson wrote:
>>
>>
>> > Larry,
>> >
>> > I've thought about this very issue before (java developers sometimes
>> lament
>> > this issue, too), and I error on the side of duplication
>
>
> > Larry,
> >
> > I've thought about this very issue before (java developers sometimes
> lament
> > this issue, too), and I error on the side of duplication if I'm using
> > inheritance.
> >
> > However, I'd say I rarely use inheritance for anything in my development,
> > and I'm much more lik
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 1:14 PM, la...@garfieldtech.com <
la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> On 5/27/10 12:10 PM, Adam Richardson wrote:
>
> Larry,
>>
>> I've thought about this very issue before (java developers sometimes
>> lament
>> this issue, too), and I error on the side of duplication if I'm
On 27 May 2010 18:10, Adam Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:44 PM, la...@garfieldtech.com <
> la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
>
>> On 5/27/10 11:30 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>>
>> Sure, but @param, @access and possibly @return are but a part. I stand
> by my words: document the paren
On 5/27/10 12:10 PM, Adam Richardson wrote:
Larry,
I've thought about this very issue before (java developers sometimes lament
this issue, too), and I error on the side of duplication if I'm using
inheritance.
However, I'd say I rarely use inheritance for anything in my development,
and I'm mu
On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 12:44 PM, la...@garfieldtech.com <
la...@garfieldtech.com> wrote:
> On 5/27/10 11:30 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
> Sure, but @param, @access and possibly @return are but a part. I stand
by my words: document the parent as a stub and provide actual
documentation for t
On 27 May 2010 17:21, la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
> On 5/27/10 11:13 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
>>> I'm overriding the method because I want to change the *implementation*.
>>> The *interface* of it, which is documented in the docblock, should not
>>> change and it's a bug (and possibly compile er
On 5/27/10 11:30 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
Sure, but @param, @access and possibly @return are but a part. I stand
by my words: document the parent as a stub and provide actual
documentation for the real implementations. Otherwise you're trying to
be *clever* and will see the age-old result: you'll e
On 27 May 2010 18:21, la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
> On 5/27/10 11:13 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
>>> I'm overriding the method because I want to change the *implementation*.
>>> The *interface* of it, which is documented in the docblock, should not
>>> change and it's a bug (and possibly compile er
On 5/27/10 11:13 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
I'm overriding the method because I want to change the *implementation*.
The *interface* of it, which is documented in the docblock, should not
change and it's a bug (and possibly compile error) if it does change. You
cannot, for instance, change what par
On 27 May 2010 17:57, la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
> On 5/27/10 10:43 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
>
>> You're overriding the function. IDEs should *not* show the parent
>> documentation, because the parent function does *not* get called. It
>> only gets called if you do a specific parent::hello($a, $b)
On 5/27/10 10:43 AM, Peter Lind wrote:
You're overriding the function. IDEs should *not* show the parent
documentation, because the parent function does *not* get called. It
only gets called if you do a specific parent::hello($a, $b);
*snip*
So it seems like no matter what I do, someone gets
On 27 May 2010 17:15, la...@garfieldtech.com wrote:
> Hi folks.
>
> OK, so here's the deal. I am trying to figure out the "right" way to
> document methods in OO code that includes method overriding in child
> classes. Simple, right? Unfortunately, it seems the tools out there are
> making this
15 matches
Mail list logo
