So sprach »Francis Fillion« am 2001-07-18 18.07.2001 um 17:55:41 -0400 :
> thing. Then an other thing is to take big table and put them in smaller
> table, way faster for writing/reading (hum, I don't quite remember if
Good idea. Combined with MERGE tables, this might really boost
performance wh
So sprach »Martin Marconcini« am 2001-07-18 18.07.2001 um 18:44:21 -0230 :
> Database on one SCSI disk, WEBsites on ANOTHER and preferably OS on
> another different. That way three partitions can be read at the same
Hmm, actually I'd also suggest to use RAID - real RAID I mean, not
software RAID.
Well for myself I will better like to have the 2 computer design, 1 for
httpd and 1 for mysql, it's alway's better that way the few nano that
you lose in transit are way better then a server that do both stuff. Now
the problem (that eat a lot of time is php and mysql, doh!). So you have
optimise
>
> Hello everyone-
>
> I need some expert advice so I turn you to all! :)
Don't know if expert is my case :)
>
> is to put the database on it's own machine and put the sites on a
> different
> machine to reduce the cpu load. However, I'm not 100% sure this is
the
> best
> option. I know the
4 matches
Mail list logo
