Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread Chris Lambert

MySQL is easier to use and faster to develop with for 90% of web
applications. Sure, PostgreSQL has some huge advantages, but not everyone
needs the same thing.

/* Chris Lambert, CTO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats
Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net
*/

- Original Message -
From: nafiseh saberi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 4:24 AM
Subject: [PHP] mysql , postgres


|
| hi.
| why most of you , use mysql and not
| postgres?
| nafiseh.
|
| --
| PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread Chris Lambert

Rules, triggers, subselects, built in transactions, etc.

I haven't used it myself, but it does have features which relieve a lot of
the client programming (PHP) required with MySQL.

/* Chris Lambert, CTO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats
Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net
*/

- Original Message -
From: Tom Carter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Chris Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 5:41 AM
Subject: Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres


| What would you say the advantages were?
|
| other than just the fact the the postgres implementation of sql is more
| powerful (sub-selects etc).
|
| I'ld be very interested to see some performance comparisions if anyone has
| any
| - Original Message -
| From: Chris Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 10:21 AM
| Subject: Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres
|
|
|  MySQL is easier to use and faster to develop with for 90% of web
|  applications. Sure, PostgreSQL has some huge advantages, but not
everyone
|  needs the same thing.
| 
|  /* Chris Lambert, CTO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats
|  Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net
|  */
| 
|  - Original Message -
|  From: nafiseh saberi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 4:24 AM
|  Subject: [PHP] mysql , postgres
| 
| 
|  |
|  | hi.
|  | why most of you , use mysql and not
|  | postgres?
|  | nafiseh.
|  |
|  | --
|  | PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
|  | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  | To contact the list administrators, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  |
|  |
|  |
| 
| 
|  --
|  PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
|  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|  To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| 
|
|
| --
| PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
| To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
|
|


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread Michael

Chris Lambert wrote:
 
 MySQL is easier to use and faster to develop with for 90% of web
 applications. Sure, PostgreSQL has some huge advantages, but not everyone
 needs the same thing.

easier to use ? I'm not sure why anyone would say that
faster to develop ? nope - I find postgresql quicker to develop with, I
can use triggers to cut out a whole heap of extra php code.
MYsql lacks subselects which forces you to do extra code, it lacks true
foreign keys which means you need to add extra code to check data
integrity.

People use MYSql because it's so widely available, just like people use
Windows.


 
 /* Chris Lambert, CTO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats
 Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net
 */
 

 |
 |

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread Michael

Tom Carter wrote:
 
 What would you say the advantages were?
 
Well just my opinion but I think that Postgresql development is
advancing quicker. With Red Hat joining in development and no infighting
bewteen Postgresql developers  things are looking good for the future.

 other than just the fact the the postgres implementation of sql is more
 powerful (sub-selects etc).

Foreign keys, triggers both make life a lot easier.
Also once your used to Postgresql, moving onto Sybase, Interbase etc
isn't near as hard as making the jump from MYsql.

 
 I'ld be very interested to see some performance comparisions if anyone has
 any

Dig around greatbridge.org and you might find some.

 - Original Message -
 From: Chris Lambert [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 10:21 AM
 Subject: Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres
 
  MySQL is easier to use and faster to develop with for 90% of web
  applications. Sure, PostgreSQL has some huge advantages, but not everyone
  needs the same thing.
 
  /* Chris Lambert, CTO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats
  Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net
  */
 
  - Original Message -
  From: nafiseh saberi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Sunday, August 19, 2001 4:24 AM
  Subject: [PHP] mysql , postgres
 
 
  |
  | hi.
  | why most of you , use mysql and not
  | postgres?
  | nafiseh.
  |
  | --
  | PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
  | To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  | For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  | To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  |
  |
  |
 
 
  --
  PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
  To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread Tom Carter



 Chris Lambert wrote:
 
  MySQL is easier to use and faster to develop with for 90% of web
  applications. Sure, PostgreSQL has some huge advantages, but not
everyone
  needs the same thing.

 easier to use ? I'm not sure why anyone would say that
 faster to develop ? nope - I find postgresql quicker to develop with, I
 can use triggers to cut out a whole heap of extra php code.
 MYsql lacks subselects which forces you to do extra code, it lacks true
 foreign keys which means you need to add extra code to check data
 integrity.

 People use MYSql because it's so widely available, just like people use
 Windows.

I would definately agree with the points about psotgresql having better
functionallity, but it doesn't solely come down to availablility.

MySQL is a simpler RDBMS.. this doesn't mean it is strictly worse than
postgresql. In comes to one of those fundamental questions in IT... best
tool for the job. What MySQl is good at is handling small (in both byte and
row sense) tables which are frequently accessed, eg user authenitcatino. At
the other extreme are the big boys of DB2, Oracle etc which can handle an
awful lot and cope which much more complex structures and heavy usage.
postgresql, IMHO, is a few steps from the MySQL extreme towards DB2. What I
basically mean is that postgre has some features and functionallity which
make it more suited to some tasks, and mysql has a place too.





 
  /* Chris Lambert, CTO - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  WhiteCrown Networks - More Than White Hats
  Web Application Security - www.whitecrown.net
  */
 

  |
  |

 --
 PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread indrek siitan

Hi,

 Well just my opinion but I think that Postgresql development is
 advancing quicker. With Red Hat joining in development and no
 infighting bewteen Postgresql developers  things are looking
 good for the future.

just to clear one issue - there has never been a fight between mysql
developers.

the thing you're probably referring to above is the MySQL-vs-NuSphere fight.
NuSphere was to add their Gemini table handler (MySQL has an abstraction table
handler layer, so you can add many different table handlers) to MySQL. it has
not and won't affect the general development of MySQL.


Rgds,
Indrek

--
For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/
   __  ___ ___   __
  /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Indrek Siitan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   MySQL AB, The Web Guru
/_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   Tallinn, Estonia
   ___/   www.mysql.com


-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Re: [PHP] mysql , postgres

2001-08-19 Thread Michael

Indrek Siitan wrote:
 
 Hi,
 
  Well just my opinion but I think that Postgresql development is
  advancing quicker. With Red Hat joining in development and no
  infighting bewteen Postgresql developers  things are looking
  good for the future.
 
 just to clear one issue - there has never been a fight between mysql
 developers.
 
 the thing you're probably referring to above is the MySQL-vs-NuSphere fight.
 NuSphere was to add their Gemini table handler (MySQL has an abstraction table
 handler layer, so you can add many different table handlers) to MySQL. it has
 not and won't affect the general development of MySQL.
 
 Rgds,
 Indrek
 
fair enough - slip of the tongue there 

but it does highlight the differences in in development style between
MYsql and Postgresql.



 For technical support contracts, goto https://order.mysql.com/
__  ___ ___   __
   /  |/  /_ __/ __/ __ \/ /Indrek Siitan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
  / /|_/ / // /\ \/ /_/ / /__   MySQL AB, The Web Guru
 /_/  /_/\_, /___/\___\_\___/   Tallinn, Estonia
___/   www.mysql.com

-- 
PHP General Mailing List (http://www.php.net/)
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list administrators, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]