RE: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-23 Thread John Horton
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 10:06 To: Jimmy Lantz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3 There is no use of hashing in file-encryption except to use it as a check - to see if the decrypted file matches the original file

Re: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
Panicker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 10:06 To: Jimmy Lantz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3 There is no use of hashing in file-encryption except to use it as a check - to see if the decrypted file matches the original

RE: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread John Horton
To: John Horton Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jimmy Lantz Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3 And why not use AES, which is an industry standard and having being proven as the best encryption algorithm in recent times? http://csrc.nist.gov/encryption/aes/aesfact.html

Re: RE: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread Vinod Panicker
files in cbc? JH -Original Message- From: Vinod Panicker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 22 May 2002 10:25 To: John Horton Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Jimmy Lantz Subject: Re: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3 And why not use AES, which is an industry standard

Re: RE: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3

2002-05-22 Thread Evan Nemerson
To: Jimmy Lantz Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: RE: [PHP] Mcrypt: Blowfish or Twofish or no fish? part 3 There is no use of hashing in file-encryption except to use it as a check - to see if the decrypted file matches the original file. To do this check, you can use either MD5 or SHA1