I posted an RFC for socket activation [1] to the PHP Internals mailing
list [2] several weeks ago. There's been a bit of discussion and no
significant opposition.
I would like to move the RFC to the voting phase. I assume this is the
right place to ask, given that this is where I asked for the RFC
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63475&edit=1
ID: 63475
Updated by: [email protected]
Reported by:mark at streamservice dot nl
Summary:Time for the last update on php.net mirrors is in
the future
-Status:
Edit report at https://bugs.php.net/bug.php?id=63475&edit=1
ID: 63475
Updated by: [email protected]
Reported by:mark at streamservice dot nl
Summary:Time for the last update on php.net mirrors is in
the future
-Status:
From: mark at streamservice dot nl
Operating system: Irrelevant (Windows + Linux)
PHP version: Irrelevant
Package: Website problem
Bug Type: Bug
Bug description:Time for the last update on php.net mirrors is in the future
Description:
Going to nl1.php
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 10:32 -0500, Daniel Brown wrote:
>
> Other projects, such as Apache's Perl distribution, mod_perl,
> classify as 5D002[2], but they distribute OpenSSL as part of the
> pre-compiled binary package. OpenSSL, of course, would be 5D002, but
> because of the unrestricted, pub
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Pierre Joye wrote:
> we should really add this info to the download page :)
I agree to having information on the page, but I'm not entirely
sure the TSU exception applies here.
About three weeks ago, I was on the phone with reps from the State
Department a
we should really add this info to the download page :)
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 10:39 PM, Andrew A. Forrest
wrote:
> Thanks Johannes.
>
> Kind Regards,
> Andrew
>
>
> _
> Andrew Forrest
> Systems Administrator
> GrantStream Inc.
> Helping Companies Help Communities
> E: aforr...@grantstream
