On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:36 PM, Maciej Sobaczewski wrote:
>> I think there are two things used there:
>> - recvcheck
>> - phd release page
>>
>
> So, to summarize my and your ideas:
>
> - the only project which is actually using doc.php.net is PHP
>
> - the only tool used is revcheck
>
> - PhD sh
I think there are two things used there:
- recvcheck
- phd release page
So, to summarize my and your ideas:
- the only project which is actually using doc.php.net is PHP
- the only tool used is revcheck
- PhD shouldn't be project anymore but proper section shold find place
on this website
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 11:17 AM, Maciej Sobaczewski
wrote:
>
>> I wasn't even aware anyone was still using doc.php.net for anything.
>
> I was contributing for a Polish manual version few months ago and on of our
> team members told me about that site. I think there are many advanced tools
> (mai
> I wasn't even aware anyone was still using doc.php.net for anything.
I was contributing for a Polish manual version few months ago and on of
our team members told me about that site. I think there are many
advanced tools (mainly revcheck.php and it's submodules) and
documentation mantainers
On Sun, Mar 16, 2014 at 2:28 AM, Maciej Sobaczewski
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> continuing my efforts to update old and obsolete php.net sites, now I
> would like to present my proposal of changes to doc.php.net. As I can
> miss some important things, any feedback is appreciated.
>
> Currently I don't hav
Hello,
continuing my efforts to update old and obsolete php.net sites, now I
would like to present my proposal of changes to doc.php.net. As I can
miss some important things, any feedback is appreciated.
Currently I don't have VCS access, so I will still sending my changes as
PRs but my acco
