On 17 January 2013 18:14, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mike Griffiths wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17 January 2013 17:47, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Mike Griffiths
>>> wrote:
>>>
I agree, there are lots of instances whe
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Mike Griffiths wrote:
>
> On 17 January 2013 17:47, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Mike Griffiths wrote:
>>
>>> I agree, there are lots of instances where this is a very bad idea,
>>> especially when you consider the number o
On 17 January 2013 17:47, Sherif Ramadan wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Mike Griffiths wrote:
>
>> I agree, there are lots of instances where this is a very bad idea,
>> especially when you consider the number of user notes which seem to be
>> replies to other notes but not refe
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 12:20 PM, Levi Morrison wrote:
> Sherif (aka GoogleGuy):
>
> Could you please reimplement the posts in the order they were created?
> I like the upvote functionality but that doesn't mean that good posts
> should go to the top: rather, we should monitor bad posts and delete
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:09 AM, Mike Griffiths wrote:
> I agree, there are lots of instances where this is a very bad idea,
> especially when you consider the number of user notes which seem to be
> replies to other notes but not referenced as such.
>
PHP user contributed notes is not a forum o
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 9:44 AM, Booksort wrote:
> Why have you changed to label posts as eg '1 year ago'?
>
This was made to provide a more relative format for when the note was
submitted. As notes get older it is less and less important to know exactly
when a user note was submitted and 1 day
Definitely!!
On 17 Jan 2013, at 17:26, Mike Griffiths wrote:
> On 17 January 2013 17:20, Levi Morrison wrote:
>
>> Sherif (aka GoogleGuy):
>>
>> Could you please reimplement the posts in the order they were created?
>> I like the upvote functionality but that doesn't mean that good posts
>> s
On 17 January 2013 17:20, Levi Morrison wrote:
> Sherif (aka GoogleGuy):
>
> Could you please reimplement the posts in the order they were created?
> I like the upvote functionality but that doesn't mean that good posts
> should go to the top: rather, we should monitor bad posts and delete
> them
Sherif (aka GoogleGuy):
Could you please reimplement the posts in the order they were created?
I like the upvote functionality but that doesn't mean that good posts
should go to the top: rather, we should monitor bad posts and delete
them when appropriate.
--
PHP Webmaster List Mailing List (htt
I agree, there are lots of instances where this is a very bad idea,
especially when you consider the number of user notes which seem to be
replies to other notes but not referenced as such.
Mike (mikemike)
On 17 January 2013 14:44, Booksort wrote:
> Why have you changed to label posts as eg '1
10 matches
Mail list logo
