The chapter "Predefined Constants" in Appendixes is empty in the
latest chm manual.
--
Best regards,
Olexandr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At http://www.php.net/download-docs.php we can read the following:
Note that the packaged HTML version of the manual (tar.bz2)
don't contain any directories...
But AFAIK there must be "doesn't" instead of "don't" :)
--
Best regards,
Olexandr mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In chapter "Installation on Windows systems" I've read the following:
Table 2-1. PHP Extensions
ExtensionDescription Notes
...
php_sablot.dll XSLT functionsRequires: sablot.dll (bundled)
...
There must be php_xslt.dll instead of php_sablot.dll.
--
Best regards,
Olexandr
Hello derick,
Thursday, May 09, 2002, 2:34:59 PM, you wrote:
dpn> On Thu, 9 May 2002, Olexandr Vynnychenko wrote:
>> I have just downloaded the latest CHM manual. It's not only very slow.
>> It's buggy (see 1.png).
dpn> New ones are being generated right now, can
Hello Gabor,
Friday, February 22, 2002, 11:27:27 PM, you wrote:
>> Here my quick hack. Annotations welcome!
>> Suggestions for the right place in the faq?
GH> Of course it would fit into the 'Misc' section. As it
GH> goes up, I'll put a link to it to download-docs.php ;)
GH> The Q&A seems righ
Hello Gabor,
Friday, December 21, 2001, 4:01:03 PM, you wrote:
GH> Hi Olexandr, Derick and phpdoc!
GH> I have changed the script responsible for the index
GH> and TOC generation. It is a major rewrite. It seems
GH> correct on my machine. Although I have not experienced
GH> any missing part prob
Hello Gabor,
Sunday, December 16, 2001, 2:59:59 PM, you wrote:
>> >> Please, could you tell me why "manual_en.chm"'s Contents and Index are
>> >> broken? For example, there is no mention about xslt functions neither
>> >> in Contents nor in Index. But Search gives results on "xslt".
>>
>> GH> C
Hello Gabor,
Saturday, December 15, 2001, 8:59:39 PM, you wrote:
>> Please, could you tell me why "manual_en.chm"'s Contents and Index are
>> broken? For example, there is no mention about xslt functions neither
>> in Contents nor in Index. But Search gives results on "xslt".
GH> Can you provid
Hello phpdoc,
I noticed an interesting thing: in php_manual_en.pdf in Table of
Contents items on the top of each page are not linked, only their
pagenumbers (see pdf.png).
--
Best regards,
Olexandr Vynnychenko mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pdf.png
Description: PNG
Hello derick,
Wednesday, December 12, 2001, 10:32:50 PM, you wrote:
dpn> On Wed, 12 Dec 2001, Peter wrote:
>> Is the documentation on the PHP website (in particular the .chm help file)
>> up to date to include the changes in the new version?
>>
dpn> The CHM version was generated yesterday, fro
Hello Gabor,
Tuesday, November 27, 2001, 9:28:10 PM, you wrote:
GH> Full result data is available on the CHM page:
GH> http://weblabor.hu/php/newchm.php
But distribution of IE versions at
http://weblabor.hu/php/ieversion.html is not ok. Your script didn't
include unrecognized versions. But ther
Hello phpdoc,
How can I add a user note to annotated manual at
http://www.php.net/manual/en/ ? I tried clocking "+" sign on that
page but nothing happened.
--
Best regards,
Olexandr Vynnychenko mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
DR> Thas last time I uploaded was 25 October, but it seems it's not correctly
DR> distributed anymore.
And what does it mean?
--
Best regards,
Olexandrmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Development of new manual is good but don't forget about "old" or
"traditional" one. That's what I just have read on php manual page:
Single HTML
Date: 30 Oct 2001
Windows HTML Help
Date: 30 Sep 2001
Do you see it? The difference is 1 month. Could you please uptade the
"old" chm?
--
Best regar
HG> Do you think that online functions are useless for the common user?
Oh, I see.. Of course i't cool when you can just click and see the
latest information, especially about user notes, which can be added
often... That's right idea.
--
Best regards,
Olexandrmailto
>> Another idea is to make the fonts a point or two
>> smaller, since they are quite generously large. (At
>> least this is unlike some places where the code is
>> displayed in 6pt Eyestrain Monospace...) But these
>> fonts would still be very readable at a point or two
>> smaller.
HG> IMHO, i
And another one thing... That yellow/brown/orange backround in user
notes makes me MAAD! Could you please change it to blue/violet or
something like that?
--
Best regards,
Olexandr Vynnychenko mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Contrary, the notes are now easier to spot because of the
>> surroundin border.
HG> Happy to hear that :)
But notes and see also should be bordered with different colors.
>> .) Purpose, Usage, Availability: IMHO much better to read (except
>> the brightened background image)
HG> I'll think
Hello Bruno,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 8:01:27 PM, you wrote:
BF> I've taken a good look at the new PHP manual design. I am a webdeveloper
BF> (and sometimes designer), and i've looked already through a "couple" of
BF> pages :)
BF> I have to say that it looks a bit like the ma
SS> HOME-MAILERS NEEDED!
SS> $300 - $1000 PLUS WEEKLY . . .
Something like spam filter is needed here...
--
Best regards,
Olexandrmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
HG> What screen resolution you use? Do you think it is common.
HG> I use 1024x768, and developed the CHM using this size. The
HG> images in this resolution are just like toolbar icons from
HG> any program...
I'm using 800x600 today. But look at the top of typical page of either
php_manual_newchm_
Hello Hojtsy,
HG> You have said nothing about the alternate grouping of function properties,
You know, I like the "old" layout. There is no useless elements. Every
sign, every dot means something.
HG> the outside links made truly outside, and marked with an arrow... These
HG> are __not__ only g
Hello Markus,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 1:52:21 AM, you wrote:
MF> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:36:26PM +0100, Hojtsy Gabor wrote :
>> http://weblabor.hu/php/newchm.html
>>
>> Now path menu is also included on all pages!
MF> Great :-)
MF> As you said, colorful as it was before. The icons are r
Hello Hojtsy,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 12:21:29 AM, you wrote:
>> While you mention it, I also found it a bit too colorful. The
>> idea of putting the user comments is the biggest plus. But I'ld
>> like to see the same colors/layout as before.
HG> I had no plan of providing two separarate form
Hello Hojtsy,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 12:12:21 AM, you wrote:
>> I'm not a professional designer and I'm not a designer at all (maybe
>> yet). But I don't like this new design. "Old" chm is better for me
>> because it looks really good. It's not so colorful but it's very
>> conveni
25 matches
Mail list logo
