>> Another idea is to make the fonts a point or two
>> smaller, since they are quite generously large. (At
>> least this is unlike some places where the code is
>> displayed in 6pt Eyestrain Monospace...) But these
>> fonts would still be very readable at a point or two
>> smaller.
HG> IMHO, i
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 03:50:15PM +0100, Hojtsy Gabor wrote :
> > .) Tables: containing enums and descriptions are much easier to read
> > in the new manual.
>
> I must have missed what you are talking about. Is that
> about the tables with border="1" and bordercolor="black"
> or something othe
> .) Tables: containing enums and descriptions are much easier to read
> in the new manual.
I must have missed what you are talking about. Is that
about the tables with border="1" and bordercolor="black"
or something other?
> Contrary, the notes are now easier to spot because of the
> surroundin
On Mon, Oct 29, 2001 at 09:41:56AM +0100, Hojtsy Gabor wrote :
> > I "old" chm notes, warnings were clearly separated too. I don't think
> > it's good when there is a lot of graphical elements. In the document
> > there must not be anything that impede reading.
>
> You have said nothing about th
> I agree that few icons is good, but they should be larger than they
> are now. I just cannot hit any of them with mouse cursor :). Maybe
> something like 32x32 or 24x24 or 32x24 (why not)?
What screen resolution you use? Do you think it is common.
I use 1024x768, and developed the CHM using thi
> I "old" chm notes, warnings were clearly separated too. I don't think
> it's good when there is a lot of graphical elements. In the document
> there must not be anything that impede reading.
You have said nothing about the alternate grouping of function properties,
the outside links made truly
Hello Markus,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 1:52:21 AM, you wrote:
MF> On Sun, Oct 28, 2001 at 11:36:26PM +0100, Hojtsy Gabor wrote :
>> http://weblabor.hu/php/newchm.html
>>
>> Now path menu is also included on all pages!
MF> Great :-)
MF> As you said, colorful as it was before. The icons are r
Hello Hojtsy,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 12:21:29 AM, you wrote:
>> While you mention it, I also found it a bit too colorful. The
>> idea of putting the user comments is the biggest plus. But I'ld
>> like to see the same colors/layout as before.
HG> I had no plan of providing two separarate form
Hello Hojtsy,
Monday, October 29, 2001, 12:12:21 AM, you wrote:
>> I'm not a professional designer and I'm not a designer at all (maybe
>> yet). But I don't like this new design. "Old" chm is better for me
>> because it looks really good. It's not so colorful but it's very
>> conveni
