[phpsoa] Re: Experiences with the ATOMPUB binding #5

2007-08-30 Thread Graham Charters
I meant to ask. Of the options to improve the API, which would people prefer, or are there any other suggestions? My current preference is for the building up of the SDO Atom model programmatically because this will not require the developer to specify they want to use something other than SDO.

[phpsoa] Re: Search cvs commits for SCA_SDO

2007-08-30 Thread Graham Charters
Thanks, Caroline, this does look useful. It also puts me to shame, since it appears I haven't committed anything for quite some time :-S On 24 Aug, 23:02, Caroline Maynard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I uploaded a form > (http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa/web/commits.html) that you can > u

[phpsoa] Re: Experiences with the ATOMPUB binding #5

2007-08-30 Thread Graham Charters
The many-valued nature of a lot of the properties is unfortunately due to the inability of XML schema to accurately describe the Atom Syndication Format. It's a while since I wrote the schema, but I seem to recall it was to do with the use of . The Atom XML is defined in terms of Relax NG which

[phpsoa] Re: XML Schema Validation in SDO

2007-08-30 Thread Simon Laws
On 8/30/07, Graham Charters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > We've recently had a number of XML related defect raised against SDO > (11923, 11925, 11926, 11927, 11930 and 11931). These seem to all boil > down to strictly enforcing the XML schema. See the brief discussion > in 11925 for more detai

[phpsoa] XML Schema Validation in SDO

2007-08-30 Thread Graham Charters
We've recently had a number of XML related defect raised against SDO (11923, 11925, 11926, 11927, 11930 and 11931). These seem to all boil down to strictly enforcing the XML schema. See the brief discussion in 11925 for more details. This phpsoa group discussion (http://groups.google.co.uk/grou