[phpsoa] Re: .NET integration and SCA_SDO 1.1.2

2007-05-11 Thread simonslaws
Thanks for doing that Mike Simon --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "phpsoa" group. To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL P

[phpsoa] Re: .NET integration and SCA_SDO 1.1.2

2007-05-11 Thread Caplan, Michael
[phpsoa] Re: .NET integration and SCA_SDO 1.1.2 > > > Hi Mike > > It seems that this is still the case. I didn't get a good answer to > whether we can turn the behaviour off so I'll go and take a look at > the code and see if we can request the omission of the type

[phpsoa] Re: .NET integration and SCA_SDO 1.1.2

2007-05-11 Thread simonslaws
Hi Mike It seems that this is still the case. I didn't get a good answer to whether we can turn the behaviour off so I'll go and take a look at the code and see if we can request the omission of the type annotations. It may be that they specified this bhaviour in the SDO spec but it's probably ea

[phpsoa] Re: .NET integration and SCA_SDO 1.1.2

2007-05-10 Thread Caplan, Michael
Hey there, Sorry for bringing up an old thread. But, I am working through the same issue right now. Is the standing solution to grab the WSDL and scrape out: xsi:type="tns3:tBody" xsi:type="tns3:tAddress" from the generated WSDL so that Visual Studio can import it? Is a more elegant solutio

[phpsoa] Re: .NET integration and SCA_SDO 1.1.2

2007-05-10 Thread Michael Caplan
Hey there, Sorry for bringing up an old thread. But, I am working through the same issue right now. Is the standing solution to grab the WSDL and scrape out: xsi:type="tns3:tBody" xsi:type="tns3:tAddress" from the generated WSDL so that Visual Studio can import it? Is a more elegant solutio