[phpsoa] Re: DUNLIN RC2

2007-06-22 Thread simonslaws 



On 21 Jun, 22:40, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Hi Matthew,

 Thanks for fixing the wsdl schema fetching problem and spinning RC2.
 It all looks good to me on Windows.  Unit tests all pass (phpt and
 phpunit).  Service generation for wsdl, xmlrpc and jsonrpc all work.
 Json-rpc mail example runs.  Ebay soap example runs and caching works.

 Regards,

 Graham.

 On 21 Jun, 16:24, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On 6/21/07, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I just uploaded a new release candidate for DUNLIN (1.2.2) into the
   files section of this google group. I deleted the previous one, so the
   one that is there, and says it was uploaded at 8:10, is the one to
   try.

   wrt to the going out on the web for no schemalocation problem, I
   went for the following compromise:

   if (strstr(file_name,2003-02-11.xsd)) {
   xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, false);
   } else {
   xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, true);
   }

   i.e., for our soap and wsdl xsds, don't go out, for others, do.

   Ok, Matthew, pragmatic as ever. It looks like the real fix is going to

  take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.

  Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,

 5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that text is equal to text.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
-HelloType xsi:type=HelloType xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/
Hello xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello;namename/namegreetingHello
Fred/greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType
+HelloType xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xsi:type=HelloType
xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instancenamename/namegreetingHello Fred/
greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType

/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28

I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.

I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.

Simon




--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[phpsoa] Re: DUNLIN RC2

2007-06-22 Thread Graham Charters 

Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
test for comparison?

Graham.

On 22 Jun, 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 22 Jun, 08:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  On 21 Jun, 22:40, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Hi Matthew,

   Thanks for fixing the wsdl schema fetching problem and spinning RC2.
   It all looks good to me on Windows.  Unit tests all pass (phpt and
   phpunit).  Service generation for wsdl, xmlrpc and jsonrpc all work.
   Json-rpc mail example runs.  Ebay soap example runs and caching works.

   Regards,

   Graham.

   On 21 Jun, 16:24, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 6/21/07, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I just uploaded a new release candidate for DUNLIN (1.2.2) into the
 files section of this google group. I deleted the previous one, so the
 one that is there, and says it was uploaded at 8:10, is the one to
 try.

 wrt to the going out on the web for no schemalocation problem, I
 went for the following compromise:

 if (strstr(file_name,2003-02-11.xsd)) {
 xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, false);
 } else {
 xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, true);
 }

 i.e., for our soap and wsdl xsds, don't go out, for others, do.

 Ok, Matthew, pragmatic as ever. It looks like the real fix is going to

take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.

Simon

  On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
  to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
  generated XML, for example,

   5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
  Failed asserting that text is equal to text.
  --- Expected
  +++ Actual
  @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
   ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
  -HelloType xsi:type=HelloType xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/
  Hello xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
  xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello;namename/namegreetingHello
  Fred/greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType
  +HelloType xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xsi:type=HelloType
  xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/
  2001/XMLSchema-instancenamename/namegreetingHello Fred/
  greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType

  /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
  RestRpcTest.php:95
  /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
  /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
  /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28

  I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
  thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
  stop the samples running though.

  I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
  is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.

  Simon

 So I have all the examples running ok now (was a curl config issue) so
 there can't be much wrong with it. Unit tests still fail. I can't just
 go fix the expected output for the tests though if you are not seeing
 these failures so I would like to know why our platforms are producing
 different output. Here's what I'm running.

 Fedora Core 6
 PHP 5.2.0
 libxml 2.6.29

 Simon

 Simon


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[phpsoa] Re: DUNLIN RC2

2007-06-22 Thread Graham Charters 

So there is :-) .  Strange this it's just the order in which the
xsi:type and xmlns:tns are written out.  Given that, I would say it's
good to go, but we need to get to the bottom of why the order is
different between Windows and Linux to avoid this in future releases.

Agree? Disagree?

Graham.

On 22 Jun, 09:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On 22 Jun, 09:14, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:



  Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
  test for comparison?

  Graham.

  On 22 Jun, 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   On 22 Jun, 08:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 21 Jun, 22:40, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hi Matthew,

 Thanks for fixing the wsdl schema fetching problem and spinning RC2.
 It all looks good to me on Windows.  Unit tests all pass (phpt and
 phpunit).  Service generation for wsdl, xmlrpc and jsonrpc all work.
 Json-rpc mail example runs.  Ebay soap example runs and caching works.

 Regards,

 Graham.

 On 21 Jun, 16:24, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On 6/21/07, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   I just uploaded a new release candidate for DUNLIN (1.2.2) into 
   the
   files section of this google group. I deleted the previous one, 
   so the
   one that is there, and says it was uploaded at 8:10, is the one to
   try.

   wrt to the going out on the web for no schemalocation problem, I
   went for the following compromise:

   if (strstr(file_name,2003-02-11.xsd)) {
   xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, false);
   } else {
   xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, true);
   }

   i.e., for our soap and wsdl xsds, don't go out, for others, do.

   Ok, Matthew, pragmatic as ever. It looks like the real fix is 
   going to

  take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.

  Simon

On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
generated XML, for example,

 5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
Failed asserting that text is equal to text.
--- Expected
+++ Actual
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
-HelloType xsi:type=HelloType xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/
Hello xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello;namename/namegreetingHello
Fred/greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType
+HelloType xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xsi:type=HelloType
xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/
2001/XMLSchema-instancenamename/namegreetingHello Fred/
greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType

/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
RestRpcTest.php:95
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
/usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28

I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
stop the samples running though.

I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.

Simon

   So I have all the examples running ok now (was a curl config issue) so
   there can't be much wrong with it. Unit tests still fail. I can't just
   go fix the expected output for the tests though if you are not seeing
   these failures so I would like to know why our platforms are producing
   different output. Here's what I'm running.

   Fedora Core 6
   PHP 5.2.0
   libxml 2.6.29

   Simon

   Simon

 There is one in my original post


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---

[phpsoa] Re: DUNLIN RC2

2007-06-22 Thread simonslaws 



On 22 Jun, 10:13, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 So there is :-) .  Strange this it's just the order in which the
 xsi:type and xmlns:tns are written out.  Given that, I would say it's
 good to go, but we need to get to the bottom of why the order is
 different between Windows and Linux to avoid this in future releases.

 Agree? Disagree?

 Graham.

 On 22 Jun, 09:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  On 22 Jun, 09:14, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   Hi Simon, can you post what you're seeing for one of the failing unit
   test for comparison?

   Graham.

   On 22 Jun, 09:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

On 22 Jun, 08:39, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On 21 Jun, 22:40, Graham Charters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  Hi Matthew,

  Thanks for fixing the wsdl schema fetching problem and spinning RC2.
  It all looks good to me on Windows.  Unit tests all pass (phpt and
  phpunit).  Service generation for wsdl, xmlrpc and jsonrpc all work.
  Json-rpc mail example runs.  Ebay soap example runs and caching 
  works.

  Regards,

  Graham.

  On 21 Jun, 16:24, Simon Laws [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

   On 6/21/07, Matthew Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I just uploaded a new release candidate for DUNLIN (1.2.2) into 
the
files section of this google group. I deleted the previous one, 
so the
one that is there, and says it was uploaded at 8:10, is the one 
to
try.

wrt to the going out on the web for no schemalocation 
problem, I
went for the following compromise:

if (strstr(file_name,2003-02-11.xsd)) {
xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, false);
} else {
xmldas-xsdHelperPtr-defineFile(file_name, true);
}

i.e., for our soap and wsdl xsds, don't go out, for others, do.

Ok, Matthew, pragmatic as ever. It looks like the real fix is 
going to

   take a little time. Thanks for respinning the RC.

   Simon

 On FC6 I see 5 unit test failures and 1 phpt failure. They seem to be
 to do with modification of the order of namespace definitions on
 generated XML, for example,

  5) testGETForm(SCA_RestRpcTest)
 Failed asserting that text is equal to text.
 --- Expected
 +++ Actual
 @@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
  ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
 -HelloType xsi:type=HelloType xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/
 Hello xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance;
 xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello;namename/namegreetingHello
 Fred/greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType
 +HelloType xmlns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xsi:type=HelloType
 xmlns:tns=http://www.example.org/Hello; xmlns:xsi=http://www.w3.org/
 2001/XMLSchema-instancenamename/namegreetingHello Fred/
 greetingreversedderF olleH/reversed/HelloType

 /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/SCA/phpunit/RestRpc/
 RestRpcTest.php:95
 /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:41
 /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/TestSuite.php:58
 /usr/local/lib/php/test/SCA_SDO/tests/AllTests.php:28

 I'm assuming this is to do with the WSDL validation changes but I
 thought the test expect results had caught up with this. They don't
 stop the samples running though.

 I also have a problem running one of the JSONRPC samples which I think
 is a configuration problem. Give me a little time to investigate this.

 Simon

So I have all the examples running ok now (was a curl config issue) so
there can't be much wrong with it. Unit tests still fail. I can't just
go fix the expected output for the tests though if you are not seeing
these failures so I would like to know why our platforms are producing
different output. Here's what I'm running.

Fedora Core 6
PHP 5.2.0
libxml 2.6.29

Simon

Simon

  There is one in my original post

I've just tried the code on Windows and it does get a clean bill of
health for me. So I've raised  http://pecl.php.net/bugs/bug.php?id=11401
but yes +1 for going with RC2.

Simon


--~--~-~--~~~---~--~~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
phpsoa group.
To post to this group, send email to phpsoa@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.co.uk/group/phpsoa?hl=en
-~--~~~~--~~--~--~---