Hi Kieran,
I've been made aware that someone sent a completed CLA to the email
address and for some reason it never arrived, so I wanted to make sure
this hasn't also happened to you. If you haven't sent a completed
CLA, that's fine, but if you have, please let me know, because it
hasn't been re
Hi Kieran,
I like the name @header for a generic header annotation. It may be
that other protocols can support the same header data, in which case
tying it to a specific bindings (e.g. @soapheader) would be too
limiting.
Have you had any thoughts on the public property vs header method? It
loo
Rajini,
Yes. I've been working on the WSDL generation..
though I'm not working off the CVS (that needs to change)..I'm working off
1.1.2..
what are your thoughts on the naming for the annotation?
Regards,
Kieran
On 3/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> I have been look
I have been looking at the support required to handle headers using
Approach 1
that Graham described.
At the moment, SDO_TypeHandler gets called to decode the header if an
element
is defined in the WSDL with the same name as the type of the header.
Using
Graham's example, SDO_TypeHandler.fromXml
Hi Kieran,
I've just updated the CLA to reflect the project rename. It's under
the AVOCET branch pecl/sdo/CLA.txt. To make life a little easier,
I'll send you a copy directly because it looks like the google group
mucks up the formatting a bit.
Regards,
Graham.
On 7 Mar, 08:23, "[EMAIL PROTE
Hi Kieran,
I'm assured the approach just requires you to complete the form
electronically and then send it to the email address (no physical
signature necessary). Let me find the answer to the name change
before you do this, to avoid the possibility of having to do it twice.
BTW: did you see th
Graham,
No I wasn't aware of that license agreement.
I'm happy with that agreement and am willing to sign the contract. The
license agreement states that I should sign the document, are they
suggesting pen-to-paper signature or otherwise? In either case, I'm happy
to.
Regards,
Kieran
On 3/6/07
Hi Kieran,
On the subject of Contributors License Agreement, I just wanted to
make sure we're talking about the same thing (for my peace of
mind :-) ). SCA_SDO has two licenses, one which covers people using
the project (this is just the standard Apache 2 license and is linked
to in the code cop
Hi Kieran
I've had a think and consulted with a few people. I'd like to
describe two options. The first is the easiest to implement and
doesn't pollute the interface, and the second is how we should handle
this kind of thing longer term, but requires quite a bit more work.
Approach 1. Header
Rob,
I was talking about the PHP SOAP documentation. The SCA documentation seems
thorough.
Kieran :)
On 3/6/07, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On 4 Mar, 16:36, "Kieran James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Rob,
> >
> > Thanks for your input!
> > I've only had brief exposure to PHP's SOAP (
On 4 Mar, 16:36, "Kieran James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob,
>
> Thanks for your input!
> I've only had brief exposure to PHP's SOAP (I'm from the Java camp) and I
> didn't find the documentation very clear (and for that matter, the book I
> bought on "Pro PHP XML and Web Services" doesn't co
Graham,
I understand your concerns regarding the annotations and eagerly await your
thoughts on the subject.
My management and I have already looked into the licensing agreement and we
are happy with it.
All the best,
Kieran
On 3/5/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi Kie
Hi Kieran,
Sorry for not replying sooner. That's great news that you have
approval to work on this.
I'm a little concerned about having a soap header method on the
component because this will appear on any generated service interface
(e.g. .wsdl, .smd, etc), but should not be expliclity called
If there are no objections, I'll start work on it.
Regards,
Kieran
On 3/4/07, Kieran James <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Rob,
>
> Thanks for your input!
> I've only had brief exposure to PHP's SOAP (I'm from the Java camp) and I
> didn't find the documentation very clear (and for that matter, t
Rob,
Thanks for your input!
I've only had brief exposure to PHP's SOAP (I'm from the Java camp) and I
didn't find the documentation very clear (and for that matter, the book I
bought on "Pro PHP XML and Web Services" doesn't cover Headers except from
the consumers point of view). I'm amazed at the
On 1 Mar, 21:31, "Kieran James" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've only had a small amount of time to review the PHP SOAP extension. To
> summarize from my brief exposure to it, I think that SoapHeader consumption
> on the server side wouldn't be difficult to implement. I am still
> investigating t
Hi Graham,
I didn't think about what I was saying enough when I suggested Business and
Application logic should be able to see the SoapHeader.
I suggest that an ideal solution would be to bind SoapHeader to a header()
function optionally to each class.
Upon a SOAP client request for a function, t
Hi Kieran,
Do you have any thoughts on how you'd like to see this enabled in the
SoapServer and then surfaced at the SCA level? It would be good to
mock up a scenario at both levels. I could take a stab at inventing a
scenario, but if you have something in mind, that would probably be a
better
Hi Kieran,
I wrote a response a couple of days ago, but for some reason I can't
see it here, so here goes again...
On 27 Feb, 00:45, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for your replies,
>
> I'd like the WSDL generator to define the SOAP headers. Also the
> business/applicati
Thanks for your replies,
I'd like the WSDL generator to define the SOAP headers. Also the
business/application logic should be able to access any headers sent
from a SOAP client as SDO objects. I think the best place for the
definition of the headers would be in the annotations above each
class.
Hi,
I added the __setSoapHeader() to allow me to write a custom Binding
for eBay. I needed to be able to flow an eBay CustomSecurityHeader in
the SoapHeader. An extract of its use is as follows (I've modified
the code a little to show how you would use it directly on the proxy
rather than in a
On 26 Feb, 00:54, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm working with a medium sized telco in Australia to reimplement
> their CRM. First thing we're doing is to turn all their core services
> into SOAP exposed services.
>
> SOAP headers would make our life a lot easier. I'
22 matches
Mail list logo
