Updates:
Status: Verified
Labels: Type-Enhancement Priority-Medium Effort-Medium
Toolkit-Piccolo2D.Java OpSys-All Component-Core Milestone-1.3
Comment #4 on issue 89 by heuermh: Low Test Coverage of PNode
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=89
Test coverage has
Comment #3 on issue 89 by heuermh: Low Test Coverage of PNode
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=89
Portions of this patch should be reconsidered, as a binary incompatible
change has
been made:
$ clirr.sh -o piccolo2d-core-1.3-SNAPSHOT-r446.jar -n
piccolo2d-core-1.3-SNAPSHOT-
Updates:
Status: Fixed
Cc: allain.lalonde
Comment #2 on issue 89 by allain.lalonde: Low Test Coverage of PNode
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=89
I've committed the changes offered in the patch.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
Comment #1 on issue 89 by allain.lalonde: Low Test Coverage of PNode
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=89
There are 2 commented tests in there that I believe should pass but don't.
--
You received this message because you are listed in the owner
or CC fields of this issue, or
Status: New
Owner:
New issue 89 by allain.lalonde: Low Test Coverage of PNode
http://code.google.com/p/piccolo2d/issues/detail?id=89
When I started running some code metrics on PNode, I found that it had a
instruction coverage (as opposed to line coverage) of 45.6%. A scary
number consider
