Hi Jon,
I now re-did everything from scratch, in a new clean ongoing test, and I
think the results are now more what you had expected. The error messages
were now just this:
sed: 1: x86-64.darwin.base.s: extra characters at the end of x command
Ah, OK, this makes sense.
It seems that 'sed'
When it comes to examining arbitrary lists can Pilog be a good (as in terse)
and fast fit?
Take the following list for example: (one two (items knife tent
hook boots) (key1 yes) (key2 no))
We want to know if all of the following are true or not:
1.) It contains one.
2.) It contains (key1 yes),
