Good bye Paolo pa...@marsich.it :-(
You are now unsubscribed
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Alex,
I am trying to compile the latest picolisp 3.1.10 on 32 bit ARM.
I remember I sent a patch fixing ARM compilation a while ago but that
wasn't accepted, because the aditional cases would make the Makefile
ugly.
I ca fix it quickly simply by calling
(cd src ; sed -i s/-m32//g
Hi Alex,
is it expected that calling pil keeps the parent shell process around?
tomas@x ~ % pstree | grep pi
| |-zsh---pil---picolisp
I can see pil in the process list but I would prefer if it was replaced
by the picolisp process (aka shell exec).
Thank you,
Tomas
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
Hi Alex,
I am trying to compile the latest picolisp 3.1.10 on 32 bit ARM.
I remember I sent a patch fixing ARM compilation a while ago but that
wasn't accepted, because the aditional cases would make the Makefile
ugly.
Really? When was that? Please excuse my bad memory .. ;)
I managed to
Hi Alex,
tomas@x ~ % pstree | grep pi
| |-zsh---pil---picolisp
I can see pil in the process list but I would prefer if it was replaced
by the picolisp process (aka shell exec).
This can be done with the (surprise!) 'exec' function
What gives?! This stuff is broken!!!
$ git clone https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/pl-web
Cloning into 'pl-web'...
fatal: repository 'https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/pl-web/' not found
Just yanking your chain. I know this is a mercurial repo. :)
Thanks, man. Looks good. I'll study the code when
In looking at Henrik's pl-web, I copied the demo app directory
`demo-app` to a standalone directory that would be a project
directory. I called it `pl-web-demo`. Then, I copied Henrik's
libraries `pl-web` and `ext` into the project directory. And since
I'm running a global version of `pil` (in
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 07:04:20PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Tomas,
tomas@x ~ % pstree | grep pi
| |-zsh---pil---picolisp
I can see pil in the process list but I would prefer if it was replaced
by the picolisp process (aka shell exec).
This can be done with the
Hi Tomas,
I am trying to compile the latest picolisp 3.1.10 on 32 bit ARM.
You could also take a look at how Debian (Kan-Ru Chen?) is doing it.
I'm using PicoLisp on my Kobo E-Book reader, which has an ARM CPU. Works
perfectly out of the box with apt-get install picolisp :)
♪♫ Alex
--
Hi Tomas,
tomas@x ~ % pstree | grep pi
| |-zsh---pil---picolisp
I can see pil in the process list but I would prefer if it was replaced
by the picolisp process (aka shell exec).
This can be done with the (surprise!) 'exec' function
http://software-lab.de/doc/refE.html#exec
Hi Tomas,
I am trying to compile the latest picolisp 3.1.10 on 32 bit ARM.
I remember I sent a patch fixing ARM compilation a while ago but that
wasn't accepted, because the aditional cases would make the Makefile
ugly.
Really? When was that? Please excuse my bad memory .. ;)
(cd src
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 11:19:00PM +0200, Tomas Hlavaty wrote:
This can be done with the (surprise!) 'exec' function
http://software-lab.de/doc/refE.html#exec
On the other hand, if you need to use (fork) 0 for example because you
want to inherit something from the parent pil
12 matches
Mail list logo