Hi Oscar,
> Hi, I've been trying to figure out how to properly push into a
> property list but the behavior seems kinda strange.
>
> IE:
> :eee is a test class instance and vwp is a number list (2 1 4)
> (push (get :eee 'vwp) 10) -> ((10 . 2) 1 4)
You cannot use 'get' here, because it returns th
Hi Erik,
> I imagine something like CL's 'disassemble' that, given an arbitrary lisp
> expression, returns the sequence of VM instructions the expression maps to.
To extend a little what Tomas and Andreas said:
I think it is not so very useful to look at the generated native ASM
code, as it more
Hi, I've been trying to figure out how to properly push into a
property list but the behavior seems kinda strange.
IE:
:eee is a test class instance and vwp is a number list (2 1 4)
(push (get :eee 'vwp) 10) -> ((10 . 2) 1 4)
And when calling prop returns -> (((10 .2) 1 4) . vwp)
Which is useless
Hi Erik
First, the fundamentals are documented in the picolisp dir @doc64/
Look there for a start, if you haven already.
Do you have Vi or Vim installed?
If so, there is a great lookup function which does what you described.
Start pil repl with debug mode:
$ pil +
Use the vi function to look up
Hi Erik,
one of the immediate steps for pil64 compilation goes through asm file.
You can study that. Otherwise picolisp doesn't have a disassembler and
it also doesn't have a compiler.
Cheers,
Tomas
Erik Gustafson writes:
> Hi List,
>
> I'd like to develop a better intuition for how things w
Hi List,
I'd like to develop a better intuition for how things work in the lower
levels of 64bit PicoLisp, how cells are passed between registers, and all
that. I need to spend more time with the code in /src64 and going over the
docs, obviously. Any other ways you all have found to be effective i
> I starred it on github - the README deserves it purely on its own
> merits :-D ...and the link to Infected Mushroom of course. I'm
> guessing there too much coffee was involved?
>
Hey, thanks! It was getting late and the filter between my thoughts and
what gets pushed to github was malfunctionin
- Original Message -
From: andreas.rueeg...@itship.ch [mailto:andreas.rueeg...@itship.ch]
To: picolisp@software-lab.de
Sent: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:32:24 +0200
Subject:
I like it! I will not use it in my work, but I find it a nice piece of coding
art.
It might help some people to understand
On 25 August 2015 at 07:32, Erik Gustafson wrote:
> ..[snip]..
> https://github.com/erdg/insanity
I starred it on github - the README deserves it purely on its own
merits :-D ...and the link to Infected Mushroom of course. I'm
guessing there too much coffee was involved?
--
PGP fingerprint:
BB
Great question. Apologies if that was lost amongst the rest of the nonsense
there. It simply provides an alternate syntax for the mapping functions
(mapcar, seek, fish, etc).
Instead of,
(mapcar
'((X) (doThings X)
(1 2 3) )
you can write,
(mapcar@ (1 2 3)
(doThings @) )
Same idea appl
Haha, I looked at it but what is it? :-)
On August 25, 2015 6:32:28 AM CEST, Erik Gustafson
wrote:
>What's good everyone?
>
>I've really been liking the function 'map@' from a few threads back. I
>wrote a little library that follows this idea to its logical
>conclusion.
>It's mostly a joke, so
11 matches
Mail list logo
