I see, I had misunderstood the @'s meaning there. Thanks for the
clarification!
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:03 AM Alexander Burger
wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:53:50PM -0500, polifemo wrote:
> > So, running:
> > (task -5000 (/ @ 5) (tty (println 'a)))
> >
> > does not save in *Run my
On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 08:16:28PM +0200, Andras Pahi wrote:
> Thank you for your explanation.
> I will check @doc/diff from now.
And thanks for pointing this out!
I will play with rcsim again :)
☺/ A!ex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Alex,
Thank you for your explanation.
I will check @doc/diff from now.
pahihu
> On 2021. May 18., at 19:59, Alexander Burger wrote:
>
> Hi Andras,
>
>> The example below is taken from the documentation of ‘struct’ in pil21.
>> In this case ’struct’ no longer returns the address of the
Hi Andras,
> The example below is taken from the documentation of ‘struct’ in pil21.
> In this case ’struct’ no longer returns the address of the memory region.
Hmm, yes, this changed a little. Is mentioned in the @doc/diff file.
It is very useful for atomic result specifications, i.e. to
Hi,
The example below is taken from the documentation of ‘struct’ in pil21.
In this case ’struct’ no longer returns the address of the memory region.
With this change misc/rcsim.l no longer runs (I’ve learned it the hard way).
I would like to ask, that this was intentional ?
Thanks,
pahihu
##
