(de mylet (Val Var . Body)
(bind (cons (cons Val (eval Var)))
(run Body) ) )
Here is a version that do not (explicitly) depend on let or bind:
(de mylet X
((cons (list (pop 'X)) (cdr X))
(eval (car X)) ) )
/meingbg
, and is probably not
preferable if you're just going for a better syntax for the current
functionality of transient symbols.
/meingbg
programming languages do you know that support the ((return
function) arg) construct with (function dependent) run-time decision of
whether to evaluate the arguments?
/meingbg
I believe FFI or Foreign function interface is a term previously used for
this, at least in the lisp world.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_function_interface
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foreign_function_interface/meingbg
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 4:21 PM, Alexander Burger a...@software
Does 'file' help in this case? Is suspect rather not. It returns the
'file' is exactly what I was looking for, but with a set directory structure
the operation itself is not needed.
//meingbg
set everything in stone)
Sure, go on. If you want to, you could move getopts to it's own file and
(load ) it from tcphex.l, thereby making it possible to use getopts as a
library.
//meingbg
it in one of the following ways:
wget --no-check-certificate
https://github.com/meingbg/tcphex/tarball/master-O - | tar -xz
git clone g...@github.com:meingbg/tcphex.git
Browse to https://github.com/meingbg/tcphex and click on Downloads
//meingbg
Subscribe
