Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de writes:
Hi Alex,
So maybe I should treat PicoLisp as a POSIX app and make my life easy
by just using /dev/null ;)
Would that be considered 'robust'?
Indeed. I would say that this is a non-issue.
IIRC, Cygwin supports /dev/null, and otherwise PicoLisp
Randall Dow r...@randix.net writes:
Windows has the NUL (or is it NULL) device.
so I might define a function 'no-out' that calls either
,---
| (out /dev/null. prg)
`---
or
,--
| (out NULL. prg)
`--
depending on
dexen deVries dexen.devr...@gmail.com
writes:
On Saturday 08 October 2011 15:11:57 you wrote:
So maybe I should treat PicoLisp as a POSIX app and make my life easy
by just using /dev/null ;)
Would that be considered 'robust'?
Perhaps it'd be easier to supply a hacked version of `out' on
