Joh-Tob
>One does not simply say that the pil interpreter is missunderstanding.
"One" didn't :) but thank you for your solution and for explaining what
Alex meant by
>readable, Lisp-style formatted code for your posts.
Christophe
Thank you for correcting Joh-Tob straight and for your solution.
Al
You can produce a readable version of a function by (pp 'function)
2016-12-11 8:12 GMT+01:00 Alexander Burger :
> Hi Dean,
>
> first of all, could you please try to produce some readable, Lisp-style
> formatted code for your posts? If possible, boiled-down and simplified
> to the essence?
>
>
> O
Hi Dean,
first of all, could you please try to produce some readable, Lisp-style
formatted code for your posts? If possible, boiled-down and simplified
to the essence?
On Sat, Dec 10, 2016 at 10:01:18PM +, dean wrote:
> The following program shows me trying to extract a function name from a
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:31 AM, Joh-Tob Schäg wrote:
> One does not simply say that the pil interpreter is misunderstanding.
Indeed, but I think that here Dean was talking about his own misunderstanding.
> Secondly does 'pack fix your problem?
(pack Fn) would indeed be simpler than (glue "" Fn
First things first.
One does not simply say that the pil interpreter is missunderstanding.
Secondly does 'pack fix your problem?
Do you know the difference between a list of chars and a "string-like
Symbol"?
2016-12-10 23:01 GMT+01:00 dean :
> The following program shows me trying to extract a f
The following program shows me trying to extract a function name from a
"string" and execute the function using the string.
The function is called some_fn.
If I type (some_fn) directly...all is well.
When I first executed (Fn) that I THOUGHT held the function name...it
didn't so I dropped into the