Re: suppression of the target for a +Joint do not update the +Joint

2012-07-26 Thread Laurent Artaud
Le 26/07/2012 18:29, Alexander Burger a écrit : Note that (; 'objContent containers) is not correct, because the quoted symbol 'objContent' doesn't evaluate to an entity. Better would be (; objContent containers). But this wasn't a problem here, because both expressions still give NIL. Than

Re: suppression of the target for a +Joint do not update the +Joint

2012-07-26 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Laurent, > (class +Content +Entity) > (rel data (+Number)) > (rel containers (+List +Joint) contents (+Container)) > > (class +Container +Entity) > (rel data (+Number)) > (rel contents (+List +Joint) containers (+Content)) > > (pool "/tmp/test.db") > > (setq objContainer >(obj > ((

suppression of the target for a +Joint do not update the +Joint

2012-07-26 Thread Laurent Artaud
Hello. Here is a simplified test reproducing my problem: (class +Content +Entity) (rel data (+Number)) (rel containers (+List +Joint) contents (+Container)) (class +Container +Entity) (rel data (+Number)) (rel contents (+List +Joint) containers (+Content)) (pool "/tmp/test.db") (setq objConta