Re: Build problem on Mac OS X 10.9.2

2014-04-11 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi Alex, On 9. Apr, 2014, at 16:53, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de wrote: Hi Jon, .. I have investigated a bit further, and this build problem (build 32-bit on OSX 10.8 and 10.9) is not as simple to solve as I first thought. It turns out that even gcc is clang/LLVM stuff now. WTF! One

Re: Build problem on Mac OS X 10.9.2

2014-04-11 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jon, Building on 10.6 and running under 10.8/10.9 was no problem. However, today I found a solution for building on 10.8/10.9 as well. It involves re-installing the old Apple gcc 4.2. I’ve tested it this far on 10.8, building 32-bit PicoLisp v. 3.1.6.4 C, and it works. Here’s Paul

Re: Would a logging framework make sense for PicoLisp

2014-04-11 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Hi Andreas, can I put this in my ext lib: https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/ext? I will of course keep the head with your email and info etc. On Mon, Mar 10, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Thorsten Jolitz tjol...@gmail.com wrote: andr...@itship.ch writes: Hi Andreas, I'm not sure if I understand you

Re: Would a logging framework make sense for PicoLisp

2014-04-11 Thread Henrik Sarvell
I feel like I have changed the original now to such an extent that I don't have to ask anymore :-) It feels like a derivative work. However, attribution is kept in the source: https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/ext/raw/b2516583e54a97c0e903dcb5b63b0b3cb8c1934a/log.l And here:

Re: Would a logging framework make sense for PicoLisp

2014-04-11 Thread Jakob Eriksson
If it is derivative, you should ask. On April 11, 2014 7:07:25 PM CEST, Henrik Sarvell hsarv...@gmail.com wrote: I feel like I have changed the original now to such an extent that I don't have to ask anymore :-) It feels like a derivative work. However, attribution is kept in the source:

Re: Would a logging framework make sense for PicoLisp

2014-04-11 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Sorry Jakob, I should have been more clear, derivative work with enough transformativeness is fair use: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Transformativeness It seems that the earlier raw link was to that specific revision, this is better I hope:

Re: Would a logging framework make sense for PicoLisp

2014-04-11 Thread andreas
Hi guys Hi Andreas, can I put this in my ext lib: https://bitbucket.org/hsarvell/ext ? I will of course keep the head with your email and info etc Yes surely, I feel honored. Thank you for asking! By the way, let me thank you for your database tutorials on your blog, they helped a lot in the

Re: Would a logging framework make sense for PicoLisp

2014-04-11 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Andreas, On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 08:33:22PM -, andr...@itship.ch wrote: Nice, thanks for the nice namespace example. Will introduce namespaces to my code now. Side question: Can namespaces be nested? e.g. lib~sublib~symbol? Yes. ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: