Hi Andras,
> The src/ directory contains the source (ext.c or ext.l), the lib/ directory
> contains the shared lib (ext or ext.so).
Correct for pil32.
For pil21 (and also pil64) the built-in standard functions are
called directly via 'native'.
☺/ A!ex
BTW, strange, but I did not see SJain's
Hi Alex,
Yesterday SJain asked about namespaces in 32bit picoLisp
and I assumed he is using the 32bit version.
Sorry, I am living in a combined picoLisp world ( pil/pil64/pil21 ;)
My 32bit version calls the math functions directly too, since
(== 64 64) is true.
pahihu
> On 2021. May 17., at
Hi,
The src/ directory contains the source (ext.c or ext.l), the lib/ directory
contains the shared lib (ext or ext.so).
pahihu
> On 2021. May 17., at 7:27, SJain wrote:
>
> I use fixed point math quite a bit and have the following question about the
> default math.l library of picoLisp:
>
Thanks Alex,
Regards,
Kashyap
On Sun, May 16, 2021 at 10:08 PM Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi Kashyap,
>
> > I am trying to understand how big integers are stored in Picolisp. I
> notice
> > that the ASCII values of the digits are stored in some cases - for
> example
> > 1234 is stored as
I have a weird question:
Is it feasible/possible to produce an x-y plot (called a graph in science) in
linux framebuffer text console by programming in picoLisp? The application is
to do data acquisition (daq) in text console and have bare bones plot of data
while measurement is going on. Of
I use fixed point math quite a bit and have the following question about the
default math.l library of picoLisp:
The trigonometric function Sin is derived in math.l from the shared library and
function specification ext:Sin. Where can I find this shared library 'ext'?
Would appreciate if some
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> It is frustrating that E-Mail is so unreliable.
I wonder whether a #picolisp group in Matrix would be better in the long range.
☺/ A!ex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Thanks so much for the clarifications on namespaces and shared library 'ext' on
pil32.
Is it customary to end with a thank you on this mailing list? If not, then I
will omit it in future to avoid cluttering the mail.
SJain
On 17 May 2021 3:19:37 PM IST, Alexander Burger wrote:
>On Mon, May
anyone ever write a picolisp simple email/messaging server?
just curious because this reminded me...
~~~
Note: I am in the process of automating some aspects of my personal and
professional life.
This message may or may not be automated. Here’s a random emoji:
~~~
> On May
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> > Yesterday SJain asked about namespaces in 32bit picoLisp
> > and I assumed he is using the 32bit version.
>
> Oh, I see! I also did not receive *that* mail! I see it in mail-archive.com
> though.
>
> It is frustrating that
I had to retrieve that mail from the spam-folder at the server...
Karl-Heinz
> I also didn’t receive email from SJain. Did the mail program abort
> while sending some mail?
>
> John
>
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:26 Alexander Burger
> wrote:
>
> > On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:38:05AM +0200,
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 10:55:43AM +0200, Andras Pahi wrote:
> Yesterday SJain asked about namespaces in 32bit picoLisp
> and I assumed he is using the 32bit version.
Oh, I see! I also did not receive *that* mail! I see it in mail-archive.com
though.
It is frustrating that E-Mail is so
Hi John,
> I also didn’t receive email from SJain. Did the mail program abort while
> sending some mail?
I don't think so, because some people (and the archive) received it.
Also, it was received by this mailing list, but not by me, despite we are both
under the same software-lab.de
☺/ A!ex
I also didn’t receive email from SJain. Did the mail program abort while
sending some mail?
John
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 07:26 Alexander Burger wrote:
> On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 11:38:05AM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> > It is frustrating that E-Mail is so unreliable.
>
> I wonder whether a
I'm not sure if this is really a bug, since the behaviour I expected only
runs in a version of 'task I'm refactoring right now. But I'll try anyways.
So, running:
(task -5000 (/ @ 5) (tty (println 'a)))
does not save in *Run my expected:
(-5000 -1000 (tty (println 'a)))
but instead it saves
On Mon, May 17, 2021 at 04:53:50PM -0500, polifemo wrote:
> So, running:
> (task -5000 (/ @ 5) (tty (println 'a)))
>
> does not save in *Run my expected:
> (-5000 -1000 (tty (println 'a)))
>
> but instead it saves this:
> (-5000 NIL (tty (println 'a)))
>
> my guess is that `(eval (++ Prg) 1)`
16 matches
Mail list logo
