Re: French localization
I will cheer on. Salut! > 24 jan. 2017 kl. 08:18 skrev CILz: > > Hello guys, > > I'd be happy to help on that task. If anyone else want to step up on this > let's join our forces. > > Best, > > EricC > > >> Le 24/01/2017 à 07:49, Alexander Burger a écrit : >> Dear PicoLispers, >> >> is anybody able and interested to do the French localization of PicoLisp? >> Unfortunately it is still missing. >> >> This task would involve the creation of the files >> >>loc/fr >> >> and >> >>app/loc/fr >> >> with the translation strings English -> French, and the creation of >> >>loc/FR.l >> >> with the proper formats. >> >> It can be tested by adding a line to the '*Locales' global in "app/main.l". >> >> Thanks! >> ♪♫ Alex > > -- > UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: French localization
Hello guys, I'd be happy to help on that task. If anyone else want to step up on this let's join our forces. Best, EricC Le 24/01/2017 à 07:49, Alexander Burger a écrit : Dear PicoLispers, is anybody able and interested to do the French localization of PicoLisp? Unfortunately it is still missing. This task would involve the creation of the files loc/fr and app/loc/fr with the translation strings English -> French, and the creation of loc/FR.l with the proper formats. It can be tested by adding a line to the '*Locales' global in "app/main.l". Thanks! ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
French localization
Dear PicoLispers, is anybody able and interested to do the French localization of PicoLisp? Unfortunately it is still missing. This task would involve the creation of the files loc/fr and app/loc/fr with the translation strings English -> French, and the creation of loc/FR.l with the proper formats. It can be tested by adding a line to the '*Locales' global in "app/main.l". Thanks! ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Re: In the docs: within or vice versa, more glitches
Hi Jon, > And Alex: > doc/app.html, line 2208: “
Re: In the docs: within or vice versa, more glitches
Hi Mattias, I’ve found a few more glitches: doc/form/refF.html, line 101: A missing “” doc/form/refF.html, line 104: “” should have been “” doc/form/refO.html, line 100: A missing “” doc/form/refQ.html, line 20: “” should have been “” doc/form/refS.html, line 67: “” should have been “” doc/form/refV.html, line 17: “” should have been “” doc/form/refV.html, line 19: “” should have been “” There are also quite a few places like in doc/form/form.html, lines 69, 79 and 83, where I think “” should have been coded like “foo”. And Alex: doc/app.html, line 2208: “On 20. Jan, 2017, at 19:37, Mattias Sundblad
wrote: > > Hello Jon, > >> In the docs there are lots of occurrences (2325) of “”, and also >> some (751, mainly within doc/form/) of “”. I haven’t checked >> which one is the most correct. However, in doc/form/refC.html, line 82, >> there’s a bad mix: >> >> +Chg > > I'll change refC.html. Thanks for noticing! > >> I suspect there may be more of this mixed kind, but I don’t have time to >> check it right now. > > There probably is, along with other oversights. I am a bit busy this > weekend, but I will start going through the form docs and make > corrections as soon as possible. Good to see the docs being used! > > // Mattias PԔ � )mX�����zV�u�.n7�