Right you are. Brilliant! Documented indeed!
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 05:47:22PM +0100, Alexander Burger wrote:
Hi Joe,
The T appears to act as a function in your first option. Does that act like
"If true return the cdr then break out of the for loop"?
Yes, exactly. The 'T' is indeed not a
> I could do this in perl, but I wouldn't be building character ;-)
.. 20+yrs ago, I used to say that when using perl instead of some other
language :)
/Lindsay
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:47 AM, Alexander Burger
wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> > The T appears to act as a function in your first option. Doe
Hi Joe,
> The T appears to act as a function in your first option. Does that act like
> "If true return the cdr then break out of the for loop"?
Yes, exactly. The 'T' is indeed not a function, but the marker of special
clauses in the 'for' syntax (but also 'loop' or 'do'). 'NIL' is also supported
I've just found filter (which looks like find ALL) whilst reading up on
find sothank you very much both for the question and answer.
On 25 January 2017 at 07:03, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi Joe,
>
> > (de account-list
> > ("Bank Charge"."Expenses:Bank Fee") # match
Thanx Alex.
The T appears to act as a function in your first option. Does that act like "If true
return the cdr then break out of the for loop"? Would this work correctly if
something matched twice? I expect only one match and woulk like the match and break
behavior.
I could do this in perl
Hi Jon,
> It seems you forgot something in doc/form/refF.html, line 101. I guess there
> should have been “Formatting” just before the final “.”
Seems so, added the missing word.
Regards,
Mattias
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
Hi Mattias,
It seems you forgot something in doc/form/refF.html, line 101. I guess there
should have been “Formatting” just before the final “.”
/Jon
> On 23. Jan, 2017, at 14:12, Mattias Sundblad wrote:
>
> Hi Jon,
>
>> I’ve found a few more glitches:
>
> Thanks, I'll go through them and c
