On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 09:18:40PM +0200, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
> This can't be right, I must've meant (rebuild 29 'article '+ArFeLink) ?
Right, first the attribute and then the entity. Sorry I didn't notice.
Cheers,
- Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picol...@software-lab.de?subject=unsubscribe
This can't be right, I must've meant (rebuild 29 'article '+ArFeLink) ?
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 4:49 PM, Henrik Sarvell wrote:
> After some discussion on IRC I did the following:
>
> (rebuild 29 '+ArFeLink 'article)
>
> Where 29 is the number of the database file in question and 'article is th
After some discussion on IRC I did the following:
(rebuild 29 '+ArFeLink 'article)
Where 29 is the number of the database file in question and 'article is the
relation. It had (+Ref +Link), it now has (+Aux +Ref +Link).
So far I haven't noticed any problems.
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 8:13 AM, Al
Hi Henrik,
> and it was on IRC so better get it out here. What exactly happens if I for
> instance add an +Aux relation, will the DB engine recognize that it's new
> and create the index to include all concerned objects, or will it simply
When the DB model (the "er.l" file) is changed, it is not
I've been changing my database structures now and then, ie adding some
prefix class to the E/R relations, or adding new relations (without
rebuilding afterwards). Most of the time I haven't experienced any
corruption.
I think we've discussed this before but my memory of that discussion is hazy
and
