Hi Josh
Cool you figured it out!
When you have an (if) without any else statements, you could use (when) instead.
Regards
- beneroth
- Original Message -
From: Josh [mailto:k1llfre...@hotmail.co.uk]
To: picolisp@software-lab.de
Sent: Mon, 21 Dec 2015 00:26:53 +
Subject: Re: Why won'
hi,
latest picolisp (32 and 64) cant compile on CentOS 7 out of box.
installing to vmware to check.
plz, stand by.
Mike
hi,
bitmaps from (rand) from pil32 and pil64
done by "convert" from ImageMagic soft.
now looks ok.
http://imgur.com/a/bYaAr
Mike
yes, influenced by
http://goo.gl/zhTijq
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Mike Pechkin
wrote:
> hi,
>
> bitmaps from (rand) from pil32 and pil64
> done by "convert" from ImageMagic soft.
>
> now looks ok.
> http://imgur.com/a/bYaAr
>
> Mike
>
>
hi,
news from porting sandbox:
checked, pil32 and pil64 compiles on CentOS7 out of box,
when all required rpms are installed.
Mike
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Mike Pechkin
wrote:
> hi,
>
> latest picolisp (32 and 64) cant compile on CentOS 7 out of box.
> installing to vmware to check.
hi,
when centos installed from centOS7-Miminimal.iso you should install
required rpm by:
$ yum install gcc glibc-devel.i686 libstdc++-devel.i686
Mike
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 4:58 PM, Mike Pechkin
wrote:
> hi,
>
> news from porting sandbox:
> checked, pil32 and pil64 compiles on CentOS7 out o
if you run "make all" add to list:
... glibc-devel openssl-devel
Mike
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 5:35 PM, Mike Pechkin
wrote:
> hi,
>
> when centos installed from centOS7-Miminimal.iso you should install
> required rpm by:
> $ yum install gcc glibc-devel.i686 libstdc++-devel.i686
>
> Mike
>
>
>
Neat trick to test RNGs, so obvious in hindsight.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Mike Pechkin
wrote:
> yes, influenced by
> http://goo.gl/zhTijq
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 3:43 PM, Mike Pechkin
> wrote:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> bitmaps from (rand) from pil32 and pil64
>> done by "convert" from Image
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 2:43 PM, Mike Pechkin wrote:
> hi,
>
> bitmaps from (rand) from pil32 and pil64
> done by "convert" from ImageMagic soft.
>
> now looks ok.
> http://imgur.com/a/bYaAr
Interesting.
Could you please provide some more details? Like:
* the PicoLisp code
* Are pixels pure w
hi,
code is here:
https://bitbucket.org/mihailp/tankfeeder/src/4449cee7f84899243d8ce2799779caf3457f7cc2/random.l?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default
the *only* source of info from google:
http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/viewtopic.php?t=26710
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 8:04 PM, C
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 9:13 PM, Mike Pechkin wrote:
>
> code is here:
> https://bitbucket.org/mihailp/tankfeeder/src/4449cee7f84899243d8ce2799779caf3457f7cc2/random.l?at=default&fileviewer=file-view-default
>
> the *only* source of info from google:
> http://www.imagemagick.org/discourse-server/v
Hi,
Is there a way to do the conversion with pure PicoLisp?
> Suppose I implement the bmp format.
> I have a list of bits,
> that I group by 8 to have a list of bytes,
> then how can PicoLisp write these raw bytes to a file?
The built-in 'wr' does just that - writes raw bytes to the current outp
> Suppose I implement the bmp format.
Or, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Netpbm
Cheers,
--Dave
Dear Josh, greetings!
Sorry for the slight delay in response. And great that you figured out
your problem. Sorry, I missed the prog; And thanks for updating the
wiki. I just saw the update.
I checked your problem another way without prog. So, I made sure
blinky was working. I then modified blinky
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Erik Gustafson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> […]
>
> The built-in 'wr' does just that - writes raw bytes to the current output
> channel.
Indeed. I missed this one. Thanks.
Oops, it seems that Ersatz doesn't have it.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2015 at 11:12 PM, Loyall, David
wrote:
>>
15 matches
Mail list logo
