Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-24 Thread O.Hamann
Am 24.09.2013 14:40, schrieb Henrik Sarvell: If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch? http://www.gentoo.org/ I've seen Gentoo about 5 or 10 years ago, that was perfect customizable (because everything was built by needs) but not to handle for me as a normal windows user. I

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-24 Thread Jakob Eriksson
Bikeshedding! Debian. Henrik Sarvell skrev: >If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch? > >http://www.gentoo.org/ > > >On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: >> Mansur Mamkin writes: >> >>> in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux: >> >

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-24 Thread Henrik Sarvell
If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch? http://www.gentoo.org/ On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote: > Mansur Mamkin writes: > >> in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux: > > Isn't archlinux quite popular now between 'minimalists'?

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-24 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Mansur Mamkin writes: > in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux: Isn't archlinux quite popular now between 'minimalists'? ,--- | https://www.archlinux.org/ `--- -- cheers, Thorsten -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@softwa

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-24 Thread Mansur Mamkin
Hi all, in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux: http://www.colinux.org/ http://www.andlinux.org/ But it seems there is no x64 version: http://colinux.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ#Q27._Does_coLinux_work_under_64-bit_Windows Best regards, Mansur I would like to have a 1-cpu-VM

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-24 Thread O.Hamann
> That's not bad on a VM! Maybe it's not that "virtual" after all? I > must say that Linux Mint + PicoLisp is a wonderful combination. ;-) Very interesting, Jon! I'm looking for a tiny minimalistic linux for hosting picolisp in an virtual maching (VMware in my case). I would like to have a

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2013-09-23 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi, I read nice things about Linux Mint the other day, and I wanted to give it a quick run on my iMac, using the latest VirtualBox. Get it (linuxmint-15-mate-dvd-64bit.iso) up a running was a breeze, and installing it on a "hard disk" was quite like installing Mac OS X from scratch. It also l

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2012-11-06 Thread Joe Bogner
I ran a similar test the other day. Here are my timings with (fibo 33) and (cFibo 33) I'm including cFibo (since I can now run it on emu64) and ersatz. emu64: 21.632 sec emu64/cFibo: 0.111 sec pil32: 4.477 sec ersatz: 12.797 sec On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alexander Burger wrote: > Hi

Re: A few quick emu/pil timings

2012-11-06 Thread Alexander Burger
Hi Jon, > I installed the latest "ongoing" (v3.1.0.12) on my iMac, and > compared the timing results of (bench (fibo 33)). Not too useful, I > was just curious. ;-) Yeah, interesting :) > pil32: 0.804 sec > emu64: 10.032 sec > > My EmuLisp in Safari: 5.82 sec > My EmuLisp in Chrome: 8.102 sec

A few quick emu/pil timings

2012-11-06 Thread Jon Kleiser
Hi, I installed the latest "ongoing" (v3.1.0.12) on my iMac, and compared the timing results of (bench (fibo 33)). Not too useful, I was just curious. ;-) pil32: 0.804 sec emu64: 10.032 sec My EmuLisp in Safari: 5.82 sec My EmuLisp in Chrome: 8.102 sec My EmuLisp in Chromium: 8.261 sec The