Am 24.09.2013 14:40, schrieb Henrik Sarvell:
If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch?
http://www.gentoo.org/
I've seen Gentoo about 5 or 10 years ago, that was perfect customizable
(because everything was built by needs) but not to handle for me as a
normal windows user. I
Bikeshedding! Debian.
Henrik Sarvell skrev:
>If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch?
>
>http://www.gentoo.org/
>
>
>On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
>> Mansur Mamkin writes:
>>
>>> in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux:
>>
>
If VM can't be avoided isn't Gentoo more minimal than Arch?
http://www.gentoo.org/
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 7:05 PM, Thorsten Jolitz wrote:
> Mansur Mamkin writes:
>
>> in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux:
>
> Isn't archlinux quite popular now between 'minimalists'?
Mansur Mamkin writes:
> in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux:
Isn't archlinux quite popular now between 'minimalists'?
,---
| https://www.archlinux.org/
`---
--
cheers,
Thorsten
--
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@softwa
Hi all,
in case of Windows don't forget to look at coLinux and andLinux:
http://www.colinux.org/
http://www.andlinux.org/
But it seems there is no x64 version:
http://colinux.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ#Q27._Does_coLinux_work_under_64-bit_Windows
Best regards,
Mansur
I would like to have a 1-cpu-VM
> That's not bad on a VM! Maybe it's not that "virtual" after all? I
> must say that Linux Mint + PicoLisp is a wonderful combination. ;-)
Very interesting, Jon! I'm looking for a tiny minimalistic linux for
hosting picolisp in an virtual maching (VMware in my case).
I would like to have a
Hi,
I read nice things about Linux Mint the other day, and I wanted to give
it a quick run on my iMac, using the latest VirtualBox. Get it
(linuxmint-15-mate-dvd-64bit.iso) up a running was a breeze, and
installing it on a "hard disk" was quite like installing Mac OS X from
scratch. It also l
I ran a similar test the other day. Here are my timings with (fibo 33) and
(cFibo 33)
I'm including cFibo (since I can now run it on emu64) and ersatz.
emu64: 21.632 sec
emu64/cFibo: 0.111 sec
pil32: 4.477 sec
ersatz: 12.797 sec
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Hi
Hi Jon,
> I installed the latest "ongoing" (v3.1.0.12) on my iMac, and
> compared the timing results of (bench (fibo 33)). Not too useful, I
> was just curious. ;-)
Yeah, interesting :)
> pil32: 0.804 sec
> emu64: 10.032 sec
>
> My EmuLisp in Safari: 5.82 sec
> My EmuLisp in Chrome: 8.102 sec
Hi,
I installed the latest "ongoing" (v3.1.0.12) on my iMac, and compared
the timing results of (bench (fibo 33)). Not too useful, I was just
curious. ;-)
pil32: 0.804 sec
emu64: 10.032 sec
My EmuLisp in Safari: 5.82 sec
My EmuLisp in Chrome: 8.102 sec
My EmuLisp in Chromium: 8.261 sec
The
10 matches
Mail list logo