How bad would a pure picolisp implementation be?
El lunes, 20 de julio de 2015, Alexander Burger a...@software-lab.de
escribió:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 09:00:14AM +0200, klaus schilling wrote:
Artificial neural networks, support vector machines, regression, smart
classification/regression
I think this will be an exciting project. I'll try a pure PicoLisp
implementation and see how far I can go. Any suggestions to the name of the
library? PicoML sounds good.
Currently, I would start with a fuzzy logic toolbox, genetic programming
and an architecture to create multi-agent systems.
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 12:31:15AM -0700, Amaury Hernández Águila wrote:
How bad would a pure picolisp implementation be?
It depends how heavily the implementation depends on floating point. All
right if it can be handled in fixpoint. If true floating point is
needed, we must resort to 'native'
Amaury Hernández Águila amhe...@gmail.com writes:
Any suggestions to the name of the library? PicoML sounds good.
i would suggest not using 'PicoML' - that sounds like a dialect of
the ML programming language:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ML_%28programming_language%29
Alexis.
--
PicoLearn
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 11:16 AM, Alexis flexibe...@gmail.com wrote:
Amaury Hernández Águila amhe...@gmail.com writes:
Any suggestions to the name of the library? PicoML sounds good.
i would suggest not using 'PicoML' - that sounds like a dialect of the ML
programming language:
2015-07-20 2:08 GMT-07:00 Rowan Thorpe ro...@rowanthorpe.com:
If you will develop on a public repo, please do send this thread a link to
it
when you feel it is at a point that others could send pull-requests to (or
open
issues for) to help with the progress.
Will do.
I would welcome the results of your efforts, and contribute where I could,
but I think it would be best to make calls to BLAS and LAPACK, since they
are battle-tested. I am currently working my way through a book 'Handbook
of Neuroevolution through Erlang', but I prefer Lisp. Erlang is just better
I appreciate people who know the term computational intelligence. PicoCI
sounds good.
I know that BLAS and LAPACK are battle-tested, but in that case I would
just use other libraries in other programming languages (this is how I
feel). I've been doing CI in common lisp using clml, mgl-gpr, mgl,
Not using BLAS or LAPACK.
2015-07-20 3:53 GMT-07:00 Manuel Cano manutalc...@gmail.com:
What gives you more fun?
2015-07-20 12:18 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila amhe...@gmail.com:
I appreciate people who know the term computational intelligence.
PicoCI sounds good.
I know that BLAS and
If you can choose, I don't know what are you waiting for... have fun!
2015-07-20 13:03 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila amherag@gmailcom:
Not using BLAS or LAPACK.
2015-07-20 3:53 GMT-07:00 Manuel Cano manutalc...@gmail.com:
What gives you more fun?
2015-07-20 12:18 GMT+02:00 Amaury
What gives you more fun?
2015-07-20 12:18 GMT+02:00 Amaury Hernández Águila amherag@gmailcom:
I appreciate people who know the term computational intelligence. PicoCI
sounds good.
I know that BLAS and LAPACK are battle-tested, but in that case I would
just use other libraries in other
Yes, go for it!
Are you going to try and translate Fortran or C to PicoLisp, or are you
going full hog, and try to implement from scratch?
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 7:17 PM, Manuel Cano manutalc...@gmail.com wrote:
If you can choose, I don't know what are you waiting for... have fun!
2015-07-20
How suitable would PicoLisp be to implement Machine Learning algorithms?
I'm working on a Fuzzy Logic Toolbox on Common Lisp, but I like the idea of
migrating to PicoLisp.
On Sun, Jul 19, 2015 at 06:58:46PM -0700, Amaury Hernández Águila wrote:
How suitable would PicoLisp be to implement Machine Learning algorithms?
I'm working on a Fuzzy Logic Toolbox on Common Lisp, but I like the idea of
migrating to PicoLisp.
Sure, good idea! ;)
♪♫ Alex
--
UNSUBSCRIBE:
14 matches
Mail list logo
