Re: Minimal home install

[andreas]

Hi Lawrence>So what  would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code  on, say, a remote machine?Just download the tgz from http://software-lab.de/down.html and follow the install instructions http://software-lab.de/INSTALL >I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.PicoLisp is definitely suited for this. If the standard edition is too large for your needs, you could check out MiniPicoLisp (also mentioned on the download page).Regards,Andreas- Original Message - From: Lawrence Bottorff [mailto:borg...@gmail.com] To: picolisp@software-lab.de Sent: Wed, 18 Feb 2015 13:49:34 -0500 Subject: 
Yes, ssh, non-root.
 
So what  would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code  on, say, a remote machine? I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.


On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Alexander Burger  wrote:
Hi Lawrence,  > I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally > in home.  I assume that you can 'ssh' to that machine, and then have a normal, non-root access, right?   > Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a > minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this  If you don't have root access and cannot install a global PicoLisp from a distribution, I would say that you simply install locally. Fetch and unpack the latest version:     $ wget software-lab.de/picoLisp.tgz    $ tar xfz picoLisp.tgz    $ cd picoLisp  Now it depends whether this is a 32-bit or a 64-bit machine. Please check the INSTALL file for details.   > shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a "deployment" of > picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development > environment? I'm guessing not much?  Right. I would say it is the same. You just need to add your application's sources.  ♪♫ Alex -- UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe 

Re: Minimal home install

[Alexander Burger]

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 01:49:34PM -0500, Lawrence Bottorff wrote:
> Yes, ssh, non-root.
> 
> So what  would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a
> running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code  on,
> say, a remote machine? I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would
> find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.

I would recommend MiniPicoLisp on small devices. I would suggest you
fetch and compile software-lab.de/miniPicoLisp.tgz, and play around a
little.

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Re: Minimal home install

[Lawrence Bottorff]

Yes, ssh, non-root.

So what  would a minimum deployment install, i.e., I just want to have a
running repl with code loaded and able to receive commands/data/code  on,
say, a remote machine? I'm interested in picolisp partly because I would
find it fascinating to deploy picolisp on very tiny devices.

On Wed, Feb 18, 2015 at 1:09 PM, Alexander Burger 
wrote:

> Hi Lawrence,
>
> > I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally
> > in home.
>
> I assume that you can 'ssh' to that machine, and then have a normal,
> non-root access, right?
>
>
> > Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a
> > minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this
>
> If you don't have root access and cannot install a global PicoLisp from
> a distribution, I would say that you simply install locally. Fetch and
> unpack the latest version:
>
>$ wget software-lab.de/picoLisp.tgz
>$ tar xfz picoLisp.tgz
>$ cd picoLisp
>
> Now it depends whether this is a 32-bit or a 64-bit machine. Please
> check the INSTALL file for details.
>
>
> > shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a "deployment" of
> > picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development
> > environment? I'm guessing not much?
>
> Right. I would say it is the same. You just need to add your
> application's sources.
>
> ♪♫ Alex
> --
> UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe
>

Re: Minimal home install

[Alexander Burger]

Hi Lawrence,

> I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally
> in home.

I assume that you can 'ssh' to that machine, and then have a normal,
non-root access, right?


> Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a
> minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this

If you don't have root access and cannot install a global PicoLisp from
a distribution, I would say that you simply install locally. Fetch and
unpack the latest version:

   $ wget software-lab.de/picoLisp.tgz
   $ tar xfz picoLisp.tgz
   $ cd picoLisp

Now it depends whether this is a 32-bit or a 64-bit machine. Please
check the INSTALL file for details.


> shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a "deployment" of
> picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development
> environment? I'm guessing not much?

Right. I would say it is the same. You just need to add your
application's sources.

♪♫ Alex
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe

Minimal home install

[Lawrence Bottorff]

I've got a shell account with an ISP and I'd like to run picolisp locally
in home. Is that just a regular local install . . . or can I just move a
minimal set of picolisp file structure over? I'd like to develop on this
shell account. BTW, what's the difference between a "deployment" of
picolisp (i.e. simply run a picolisp repl) and a normal development
environment? I'm guessing not much?

LB