I suppose it makes more sense the more complicated the language is, as such
it makes less sense for PL than for CL for instance.
I find it useful sometimes though, when I edit too. If I misspell something,
or guess at a function (was it chop or explode?) I will be guided from the
fact that if I'm
On Sun, Apr 25, 2010 at 04:07:26PM +0200, Alexander Burger wrote:
> Having said this, however, I'm willing to include your JS part into the
> Wiki, if a democratic majority votes for it. Until now I found myself
One other problem I have with including this highlighting into the wiki:
The file "ch
Hi Henrik,
> Anyway, I've attached the JS and an example index.html that has some
> PicoLisp in it.
Nice. Thanks!
As some people know, I personally have problems with syntax highlighting
in Lisp (not to say that I don't like it ;-), because I believe that as
Lisp has almost no *syntax*, there is
