Re: Rosetta Code !!!

2015-02-20 Thread Henrik Sarvell
Mostly Alexander Burger but I believe another person also did a few,
can't remember who though...

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 2:07 AM, Lawrence Bottorff  wrote:
> Just saw the picoLisp contribution for picoLisp. Enormous! Who did all that
> work?
>
> LB
-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Rosetta Code !!!

2015-02-19 Thread Lawrence Bottorff
Just saw the picoLisp contribution for picoLisp. Enormous! Who did all that
work?

LB


Re: Rosetta Code analysis

2012-11-23 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Joe Bogner  writes:

Hey Joe,

> I added a wiki article that includes some basic analysis of the
> Rosetta Code solutions. At several points I've tried to memorize the
> usage of all the PicoLisp functions. I'm getting closer to retaining
> it, however I may use this list as a way to prioritize my learning.

I improved the formatting of your results a bit, showing them in 2
different tables (somehow this nice analysis should be included in
PicoLisp Works too, so I needed a more compact representation)

Hope thats ok for you. 

I left the original results in the article, maybe you want to double
check that there are no errors and then delete them?

-- 
cheers,
Thorsten

-- 
UNSUBSCRIBE: mailto:picolisp@software-lab.de?subject=Unsubscribe


Re: Rosetta Code analysis

2012-11-07 Thread Rudy Hagedorn
Joe: Great help. Many thanks for sharing!
On Nov 7, 2012 6:56 PM, "Joe Bogner"  wrote:

> Sorry - here is the link:
> http://picolisp.com/5000/!wiki?RosettaCodeAnalysis
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Joe Bogner  wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I added a wiki article that includes some basic analysis of the Rosetta
>> Code solutions. At several points I've tried to memorize the usage of all
>> the PicoLisp functions. I'm getting closer to retaining it, however I may
>> use this list as a way to prioritize my learning.
>>
>> I considered hyperlinking to the relevant reference for the function page
>> but didn't have the time to include that - specifically due to things like
>> the Globals. The alpha ones are pretty straightforward to map.  I may
>> update the article in the future with the links.
>>
>> I'm sharing in case others find it useful / interesting
>>
>> Joe
>>
>
>


Re: Rosetta Code analysis

2012-11-07 Thread Joe Bogner
Sorry - here is the link: http://picolisp.com/5000/!wiki?RosettaCodeAnalysis


On Wed, Nov 7, 2012 at 12:13 PM, Joe Bogner  wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> I added a wiki article that includes some basic analysis of the Rosetta
> Code solutions. At several points I've tried to memorize the usage of all
> the PicoLisp functions. I'm getting closer to retaining it, however I may
> use this list as a way to prioritize my learning.
>
> I considered hyperlinking to the relevant reference for the function page
> but didn't have the time to include that - specifically due to things like
> the Globals. The alpha ones are pretty straightforward to map.  I may
> update the article in the future with the links.
>
> I'm sharing in case others find it useful / interesting
>
> Joe
>