Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread Ashutosh Chauhan
a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily influenced by its roadmap. I think it makes sense to continue as a sub-project of hadoop. -Thejas On 3/31/10 4:04 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@gmail.com wrote: Over

RE: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread Pradeep Kamath
Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily influenced by its roadmap. I think it makes sense to continue as a sub-project of hadoop. -Thejas On 3/31/10 4:04 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread Alan Gates
@hadoop.apache.org; Dmitriy Ryaboy Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily influenced by its roadmap. I think it makes sense to continue as a sub-project of hadoop. -Thejas On 3/31/10 4:04 PM

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread Alan Gates
, April 02, 2010 4:08 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Dmitriy Ryaboy Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily influenced by its roadmap. I think it makes sense to continue as a sub-project

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread Dmitriy Ryaboy
- From: Thejas Nair [mailto:te...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 4:08 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Dmitriy Ryaboy Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread hc busy
-Original Message- From: Thejas Nair [mailto:te...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 4:08 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Dmitriy Ryaboy Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-05 Thread Daniel Dai
-inc.com] Sent: Monday, April 05, 2010 11:37 AM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project Prognostication is a difficult business. Of course I'd love it if someday there is an ISO Pig Latin committee (with meetings in cool exotic places) deciding

RE: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-03 Thread Santhosh Srinivasan
-Original Message- From: Thejas Nair [mailto:te...@yahoo-inc.com] Sent: Friday, April 02, 2010 4:08 PM To: pig-dev@hadoop.apache.org; Dmitriy Ryaboy Subject: Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-04-02 Thread Thejas Nair
I agree with Alan and Dmitriy - Pig is tightly coupled with hadoop, and heavily influenced by its roadmap. I think it makes sense to continue as a sub-project of hadoop. -Thejas On 3/31/10 4:04 PM, Dmitriy Ryaboy dvrya...@gmail.com wrote: Over time, Pig is increasing its coupling to Hadoop

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-03-31 Thread Alan Gates
So far I haven't seen any feedback on this. Apache has asked the Hadoop PMC to submit input in April on whether some subprojects should be promoted to TLPs. We, the Pig community, need to give feedback to the Hadoop PMC on how we feel about this. Please make your voice heard. So now

Re: Begin a discussion about Pig as a top level project

2010-03-31 Thread Dmitriy Ryaboy
Over time, Pig is increasing its coupling to Hadoop (for good reasons), rather than decreasing it. If and when Pig becomes a viable entity without hadoop around, it might make sense as a TLP. As is, I think becoming a TLP will only introduce unnecessary administrative and bureaucratic headaches.