[Piglit] [PATCH 2/2] arb_stencil_texturing: Verify that glBlitFramebuffer does not corrupt state

From: Ian Romanick I recently found (by inspection) that glBlitFramebuffer(GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT) from a GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER with a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE target stencil texture would corrupt the GL_DEPTH_STENCIL_TEXTURE_MODE. I was not able to fully test the

[Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] arb_stencil_texturing: Fix GL version requirements

From: Ian Romanick Realistically, the test needs OpenGL 3.0 because it requires GLSL 1.30. I doubt there will ever be a driver that can do GL_ARB_stencil_texturing that doesn't also support OpenGL 3.0. Signed-off-by: Ian Romanick Cc: Kenneth

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 2/2] arb_stencil_texturing: Verify that glBlitFramebuffer does not corrupt state

On 01/13/2016 09:02 AM, Ilia Mirkin wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: >> From: Ian Romanick >> >> I recently found (by inspection) that >> glBlitFramebuffer(GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT) from a GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER with >> a

[Piglit] [PATCH 2/2 v2] arb_stencil_texturing: Verify that glBlitFramebuffer does not corrupt state

From: Ian Romanick I recently found (by inspection) that glBlitFramebuffer(GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT) from a GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER with a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE target stencil texture would corrupt the GL_DEPTH_STENCIL_TEXTURE_MODE. NOTE: The GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE subtest fails

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 0/5] Randomized UBO tests of doom

There is at least one bigger bug in this series, and fixing it will require changes to shader-runner too. I had some e-mail either from one of the guys at VMware or one of the guys at NVIDIA, but I can't find it. My recollection is that there is some case in the generator (and shader-runner in

[Piglit] [PATCH V2] arb_shading_language_420pack: test multiple layout qualifiers on the same line

While the spec is taking about multiple layout qualifiers we interpret that to mean layout-qualifier-names can also occur multiple times within a single layout qualifier. In Section 4.4 (Layout Qualifiers) of the GLSL 4.40 spec it clarifies this: "More than one layout qualifier may appear in

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 0/5] Randomized UBO tests of doom

I seem to remember this, it was nvidia I think, if that helps you look for the email. On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: > There is at least one bigger bug in this series, and fixing it will > require changes to shader-runner too. I had some e-mail

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 0/5] Randomized UBO tests of doom

On 01/13/2016 01:34 PM, Dylan Baker wrote: > I seem to remember this, it was nvidia I think, if that helps you look > for the email. Looking at old messages in the thread... it looks like this was fixed in shader-runner in

[Piglit] [PATCH 1/2] shader_runner: add basic ssbo probing support

--- tests/shaders/shader_runner.c | 39 +++ 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+) diff --git a/tests/shaders/shader_runner.c b/tests/shaders/shader_runner.c index c00fd61..f176fdb 100644 --- a/tests/shaders/shader_runner.c +++ b/tests/shaders/shader_runner.c @@

[Piglit] Ideas for testing ARB_shader_group_vote?

I think I've finished the implementation of ARB_shader_group_vote [1] for i965/fs [2], but I haven't come up with any ideas for testing it. Please give me some ideas. :) [1] https://www.opengl.org/registry/specs/ARB/shader_group_vote.txt [2] git://people.freedesktop.org/~mattst88/mesa

[Piglit] [PATCH] arb_viewport_array: add GL_ARB_gpu_shader5 requirement for render_viewport_2

From: Roland Scheidegger The test cannot work without this (and thus always failed if not present). --- tests/spec/arb_viewport_array/render_viewport_2.c | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/tests/spec/arb_viewport_array/render_viewport_2.c

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] arb_viewport_array: add GL_ARB_gpu_shader5 requirement for render_viewport_2

Reviewed-by: Ilia Mirkin On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 7:21 PM, wrote: > From: Roland Scheidegger > > The test cannot work without this (and thus always failed if not present). > --- > tests/spec/arb_viewport_array/render_viewport_2.c |

[Piglit] [PATCH] arb_shading_language_420pack: test multiple layout qualifiers on the same line

While the spec is taking about multiple layout qualifiers we interpert that to mean layout-qualifier-names can also occur multiple times within a single layout qualifier. In Section 4.4 (Layout Qualifiers) of the GLSL 4.40 spec it clarifies this: "More than one layout qualifier may appear in

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH] arb_shading_language_420pack: test multiple layout qualifiers on the same line

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 11:48 PM, Timothy Arceri wrote: > While the spec is taking about multiple layout qualifiers we interpert that > to mean layout-qualifier-names can also occur multiple times within > a single layout qualifier. > > In Section 4.4 (Layout

Re: [Piglit] Ideas for testing ARB_shader_group_vote?

On 01/13/2016 02:23 PM, Matt Turner wrote: > I think I've finished the implementation of ARB_shader_group_vote [1] \o/ > for i965/fs [2], but I haven't come up with any ideas for testing it. > > Please give me some ideas. :) You could start with a couple simple sanity tests: - Render a

Re: [Piglit] [PATCH 2/2] arb_stencil_texturing: Verify that glBlitFramebuffer does not corrupt state

On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Ian Romanick wrote: > From: Ian Romanick > > I recently found (by inspection) that > glBlitFramebuffer(GL_STENCIL_BUFFER_BIT) from a GL_READ_FRAMEBUFFER with > a GL_TEXTURE_RECTANGLE target stencil texture would